The Politics of Byzantine Studies: Between Nations and Empires

Byzantine studies is neither the oldest nor the largest of the historical disciplines, but it is among the oddest.Its peculiarities, however, are rarely discussed by its practitioners, nor have they been much noted by intellectual historians.The appearance in recent years of multiple book-length studies of the discipline and its histories is therefore welcome.The quality of the three works here reviewed is such that each simultaneously complements and complicates the image presented by the others.The resulting view, if still far from complete, is nevertheless much greater than the sum of the parts.Three peculiarities stand out especially, each closely related to the others.The first is the discipline's distinctive multinational constellation.The International Association of Byzantine Studies is composed of some thirty-nine national committees, 1 including twenty-four current NATO members, five former Soviet republics and four Soviet-aligned satellite states.The oldest centres for Byzantine research in the Western world are located at the heart of historic institutions of educational privilege: in Washington DC (Dumbarton Oaks, administered by Harvard

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The English Historical Review
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceae159
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Byzantine Studies: Between Nations and Empires

Mirela Ivanova, Benjamin R. Anderson
The English Historical Review
Byzantine Studies and History
article

The Politics of Byzantine Studies: Between Nations and Empires

Mirela Ivanova, Benjamin R. Anderson
article en

Abstract

Byzantine studies is neither the oldest nor the largest of the historical disciplines, but it is among the oddest.Its peculiarities, however, are rarely discussed by its practitioners, nor have they been much noted by intellectual historians.The appearance in recent years of multiple book-length studies of the discipline and its histories is therefore welcome.The quality of the three works here reviewed is such that each simultaneously complements and complicates the image presented by the others.The resulting view, if still far from complete, is nevertheless much greater than the sum of the parts.Three peculiarities stand out especially, each closely related to the others.The first is the discipline's distinctive multinational constellation.The International Association of Byzantine Studies is composed of some thirty-nine national committees, 1 including twenty-four current NATO members, five former Soviet republics and four Soviet-aligned satellite states.The oldest centres for Byzantine research in the Western world are located at the heart of historic institutions of educational privilege: in Washington DC (Dumbarton Oaks, administered by Harvard

The English Historical ReviewVol. 139(600)
Cornell University (US), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.