Effectiveness of Three Turbulence Modeling Approaches in a Crosswind–Sedan–Dune Computational Fluid Dynamics Framework

The aerodynamic loads of a sedan experience significant fluctuations when passing by a sand dune at the roadside under crosswinds, which can easily cause yawing and overturning. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, based on different turbulence modeling approaches, yield different aerodynamic results for sedans. This study aims to investigate the effects of three prevailing turbulence modeling approaches (renormalization group (RNG) k-ε, large eddy simulation (LES), and improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES)) on the aerodynamic characteristics of a sedan passing by a sand dune under crosswinds. The CFD dynamic mesh models are constructed using the “mosaic” mesh technique to account for the dune–air–sedan interaction. The reliability of the CFD prediction method is verified by comparing it with field test results. The predictive capabilities of the three turbulence modeling approaches are compared in terms of aerodynamic loads and flow field characteristics. The simulation of sand particle movement is conducted through the discrete phase model, aiming to assess the impact of wind–sand flow on the aerodynamic properties of sedans. Corresponding results show that the aerodynamic loads predicted by the LES model closely match (within 4.4–7.5%) the corresponding data obtained from field tests. While the IDDES and LES models demonstrate similar abilities in characterizing the wind field details, and their results exhibit maximum differences of 8.3–15.7%. Meanwhile, the maximum difference between the results obtained by the RNG k-ε and LES models ranges from 14.8% to 18.4%, attributed to its inability to capture subtle changes in the vortex structure within the flow field. This work will provide a numerical modeling reference for studies on the wind–sand flow and the aerodynamic characteristics of sedans running through the desert, and it has implications for the safe driving of sedans under extreme conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177522
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Three Turbulence Modeling Approaches in a Crosswind–Sedan–Dune Computational Fluid Dynamics Framework

Jian Wang, Yue Dong, Weichao Yang
4 citations
Applied Sciences
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
5.20
article

Effectiveness of Three Turbulence Modeling Approaches in a Crosswind–Sedan–Dune Computational Fluid Dynamics Framework

Jian Wang, Yue Dong, Weichao Yang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The aerodynamic loads of a sedan experience significant fluctuations when passing by a sand dune at the roadside under crosswinds, which can easily cause yawing and overturning. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, based on different turbulence modeling approaches, yield different aerodynamic results for sedans. This study aims to investigate the effects of three prevailing turbulence modeling approaches (renormalization group (RNG) k-ε, large eddy simulation (LES), and improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES)) on the aerodynamic characteristics of a sedan passing by a sand dune under crosswinds. The CFD dynamic mesh models are constructed using the “mosaic” mesh technique to account for the dune–air–sedan interaction. The reliability of the CFD prediction method is verified by comparing it with field test results. The predictive capabilities of the three turbulence modeling approaches are compared in terms of aerodynamic loads and flow field characteristics. The simulation of sand particle movement is conducted through the discrete phase model, aiming to assess the impact of wind–sand flow on the aerodynamic properties of sedans. Corresponding results show that the aerodynamic loads predicted by the LES model closely match (within 4.4–7.5%) the corresponding data obtained from field tests. While the IDDES and LES models demonstrate similar abilities in characterizing the wind field details, and their results exhibit maximum differences of 8.3–15.7%. Meanwhile, the maximum difference between the results obtained by the RNG k-ε and LES models ranges from 14.8% to 18.4%, attributed to its inability to capture subtle changes in the vortex structure within the flow field. This work will provide a numerical modeling reference for studies on the wind–sand flow and the aerodynamic characteristics of sedans running through the desert, and it has implications for the safe driving of sedans under extreme conditions.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(17)
Central South University (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Rail Transit Design & Research Institute (CN)
China Railway
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
5.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.