A replication of “unconscious bias in citizens' evaluations of public sector performance”

Abstract In recent years, the phenomenon of anti‐public sector bias (APSB) has garnered significant attention among public administration scholars. It is of especial interest given its possible effects on how citizens evaluate public sector performance. Despite the prominence of APSB in academic discourse, conclusive evidence requires further empirical testing. Our study addresses this gap by conducting a replication of Marvel (2016) using a different study population (citizens from China, N = 1410). The results reaffirm the negative influence of APSB on citizens' assessments of public sector performance. Notably, our research indicates the potential for altering citizens' APSB in the context of a pro‐public sector culture. This study contributes to public administration research and the discourse on APSB by confirming the effects presented by Marvel (2016) and suggesting strategies for mitigating the negative effects of APSB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13031
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A replication of “unconscious bias in citizens' evaluations of public sector performance”

Wenna Chen, S. Zhang, G. Chen, Pinghan Liang et al.
5 citations
Public Administration
Social and Intergroup Psychology
5.66
article

A replication of “unconscious bias in citizens' evaluations of public sector performance”

Wenna Chen, S. Zhang, G. Chen, Pinghan Liang, Qiwei Li
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the phenomenon of anti‐public sector bias (APSB) has garnered significant attention among public administration scholars. It is of especial interest given its possible effects on how citizens evaluate public sector performance. Despite the prominence of APSB in academic discourse, conclusive evidence requires further empirical testing. Our study addresses this gap by conducting a replication of Marvel (2016) using a different study population (citizens from China, N = 1410). The results reaffirm the negative influence of APSB on citizens' assessments of public sector performance. Notably, our research indicates the potential for altering citizens' APSB in the context of a pro‐public sector culture. This study contributes to public administration research and the discourse on APSB by confirming the effects presented by Marvel (2016) and suggesting strategies for mitigating the negative effects of APSB.

Public AdministrationVol. 102(4)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, National Social Science Fund of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.