Comparative Study of Rapid Assessment Methods for Earthquake-Triggered Landslides Based on the Newmark Model—A Case Study of the 2022 Luding Ms6.8 Earthquake

Earthquake-triggered landslides represent a significant seismic-related disaster, posing threats to both the lives and property of individuals in affected areas. Furthermore, they can result in road and river blockages, as well as other secondary disasters, significantly impacting post-earthquake rescue efforts. Efficient, accurate, and rapid assessment of high-risk landslide zones carries important implications for decision making in disaster response and for mitigating potential secondary disasters. The high-intensity zones VII to IX of the Luding Ms6.8 earthquake on 5 September, 2022, were used as a case study here. Based on the simple Newmark model, the difference method and the cumulative displacement method were employed to assess earthquake-triggered landslides. The assessment results from both methods demonstrated that the areas posing an extremely high risk of earthquake-triggered landslides were predominantly situated on the western side of the Xianshuihe Fault. Verification using actual landslide data showed that both methods had high predictive accuracy, with the difference method slightly outperforming the cumulative displacement method. Moreover, this study recommends determining threshold values for each landslide risk interval having physical meanings using previous data on strong earthquakes when utilizing the difference method to assess the risk of earthquake-triggered landslides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177500
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Rapid Assessment Methods for Earthquake-Triggered Landslides Based on the Newmark Model—A Case Study of the 2022 Luding Ms6.8 Earthquake

Dongping Li, Min Li, Huan-yu Li, Jingfei Yin et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Landslides and related hazards
0.71
article

Comparative Study of Rapid Assessment Methods for Earthquake-Triggered Landslides Based on the Newmark Model—A Case Study of the 2022 Luding Ms6.8 Earthquake

Dongping Li, Min Li, Huan-yu Li, Jingfei Yin, Haiqing Sun, Chenbing Dai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Earthquake-triggered landslides represent a significant seismic-related disaster, posing threats to both the lives and property of individuals in affected areas. Furthermore, they can result in road and river blockages, as well as other secondary disasters, significantly impacting post-earthquake rescue efforts. Efficient, accurate, and rapid assessment of high-risk landslide zones carries important implications for decision making in disaster response and for mitigating potential secondary disasters. The high-intensity zones VII to IX of the Luding Ms6.8 earthquake on 5 September, 2022, were used as a case study here. Based on the simple Newmark model, the difference method and the cumulative displacement method were employed to assess earthquake-triggered landslides. The assessment results from both methods demonstrated that the areas posing an extremely high risk of earthquake-triggered landslides were predominantly situated on the western side of the Xianshuihe Fault. Verification using actual landslide data showed that both methods had high predictive accuracy, with the difference method slightly outperforming the cumulative displacement method. Moreover, this study recommends determining threshold values for each landslide risk interval having physical meanings using previous data on strong earthquakes when utilizing the difference method to assess the risk of earthquake-triggered landslides.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(17)
Heilongjiang Earthquake Agency (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Landslides and related hazards
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.