On Some Criteria of Evaluation of a Handwriting Expert Opinion

The article reviews challenging issues associated with carrying out handwriting examinations including the ones related to handwriting expert's competence, drawing conclusions, documentation of expert opinions. An analysis of a certain pool of reports prepared by experts carrying out professional activities in departmental expert institutions, in particular, law enforcement authorities, and privately practicing experts in the period from 2006 to 2023 has given an opportunity to identify some problems. The authors have identifi ed expert mistakes caused by the expert's professional training level, lack of experience in carrying out expert activities, personal characteristics. Special attention is paid to expert's competence that directly aff ects the quality of examination carried out and preparation of the an expert opinion. The authors have arrived at conclusions that are signifi cant on a practical level thanks to a deep theoretical analysis of the mentioned problems and multiple years of practical experience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Эксперт-криминалист.
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-442x-2024-3-12-15
Primary Topic
Information Systems and Technology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Some Criteria of Evaluation of a Handwriting Expert Opinion

Aleksey L. Poshvin, Yury S. Kudryavtsev
Эксперт-криминалист.
Information Systems and Technology Applications
article

On Some Criteria of Evaluation of a Handwriting Expert Opinion

Aleksey L. Poshvin, Yury S. Kudryavtsev
article en

Abstract

The article reviews challenging issues associated with carrying out handwriting examinations including the ones related to handwriting expert's competence, drawing conclusions, documentation of expert opinions. An analysis of a certain pool of reports prepared by experts carrying out professional activities in departmental expert institutions, in particular, law enforcement authorities, and privately practicing experts in the period from 2006 to 2023 has given an opportunity to identify some problems. The authors have identifi ed expert mistakes caused by the expert's professional training level, lack of experience in carrying out expert activities, personal characteristics. Special attention is paid to expert's competence that directly aff ects the quality of examination carried out and preparation of the an expert opinion. The authors have arrived at conclusions that are signifi cant on a practical level thanks to a deep theoretical analysis of the mentioned problems and multiple years of practical experience.

Эксперт-криминалист.
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Information Systems and Technology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Some Criteria of Evaluation of a Handwriting Expert Opinion — Aleksey L. Poshvin, Yury S. Kudryavtsev · Эксперт-криминалист. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS