On the Content of a Specialist's Opinion (Review) and Problems of Using Thereof in Judicial Proceedings

The authors study the content of a specialist's opinion (review): a currently popular expert opinion evaluation method. It is noted that the name "review" does not fully refl ect the essence and content of the document prepared by a specialist based on an analysis of an expert opinion. The authors study in detail the content of specialist's analytical activities, mention the competence limits. The author suggests the structure of a specialist's opinion and notes some problems arising in the course of its use in the proving process. The paper arrives at a conclusion about the need to develop methodological recommendations for carrying out an analytical study of an expert opinion by a specialist.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Эксперт-криминалист.
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-442x-2024-3-26-29
Primary Topic
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Content of a Specialist's Opinion (Review) and Problems of Using Thereof in Judicial Proceedings

Natalia M. Turkova, Roman A. Cherepkov
Эксперт-криминалист.
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
article

On the Content of a Specialist's Opinion (Review) and Problems of Using Thereof in Judicial Proceedings

Natalia M. Turkova, Roman A. Cherepkov
article en

Abstract

The authors study the content of a specialist's opinion (review): a currently popular expert opinion evaluation method. It is noted that the name "review" does not fully refl ect the essence and content of the document prepared by a specialist based on an analysis of an expert opinion. The authors study in detail the content of specialist's analytical activities, mention the competence limits. The author suggests the structure of a specialist's opinion and notes some problems arising in the course of its use in the proving process. The paper arrives at a conclusion about the need to develop methodological recommendations for carrying out an analytical study of an expert opinion by a specialist.

Эксперт-криминалист.
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.