Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta‐analyses

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anatomical Sciences Education
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2500
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta‐analyses

Niels Hammer, Jason M. Organ, Jonathan J. Wisco, Gabrielle M. Finn et al.
6 citations
Anatomical Sciences Education
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
2.77
article

Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta‐analyses

Niels Hammer, Jason M. Organ, Jonathan J. Wisco, Gabrielle M. Finn, Boon‐Huat Bay, Sabine Hildebrandt, Jessica N. Byram, Claudia Krebs, Adam B. Wilson, Melissa A. Carroll
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.

Anatomical Sciences EducationVol. 17(7)
Boston University (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), National University of Singapore (SG), George Washington University (US), Medical University of Graz (AT), University of Manchester (GB), Indiana University School of Medicine, Rush University (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
2.77
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.