An empirical evaluation of probing questions investigating question comprehensibility in web surveys

It is essential for the quality of survey data that questions are easy to understand. We developed four variants of comprehensibility probes measuring the comprehensibility of a survey question as a whole or of individual aspects (vocabulary, sentence complexity, content). We compared the probes on four experimental questions in terms of response distributions and mean comprehensibility scores to assess their sensitivity to capture comprehensibility problems at different levels of granularity, as well as nonresponse and response times as indicators of respondents' willingness and required effort to answer the probes. We found no differences in the response distributions and mean comprehensibility scores, while item nonresponse and response times differed significantly between the probe versions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2024.2391957
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An empirical evaluation of probing questions investigating question comprehensibility in web surveys

Cornelia Neuert, Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz
2 citations
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
2.26
article

An empirical evaluation of probing questions investigating question comprehensibility in web surveys

Cornelia Neuert, Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

It is essential for the quality of survey data that questions are easy to understand. We developed four variants of comprehensibility probes measuring the comprehensibility of a survey question as a whole or of individual aspects (vocabulary, sentence complexity, content). We compared the probes on four experimental questions in terms of response distributions and mean comprehensibility scores to assess their sensitivity to capture comprehensibility problems at different levels of granularity, as well as nonresponse and response times as indicators of respondents' willingness and required effort to answer the probes. We found no differences in the response distributions and mean comprehensibility scores, while item nonresponse and response times differed significantly between the probe versions.

International Journal of Social Research MethodologyVol. 28(3)
University of Mannheim (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An empirical evaluation of probing questions investigating question comprehensibility in web surveys — Cornelia Neuert, Tobias Gummer, et al. · International Journal of Social Research Methodology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS