Is Dosage of a Meditation App Associated With Changes in Psychological Distress? It Depends on How You Ask

Despite growing popularity, associations between dosage and outcomes in meditation app interventions have not been established. We examined this relationship using a range of operationalizations of dosage (e.g., minutes of use, days of use, number and type of activities completed) and strategies for modeling outcomes (e.g., ordinary least squares regression, multilevel modeling, latent class analysis). We used data from a recently completed randomized controlled trial testing a meditation app (<i>n</i>=662; 80.4% with elevated depression/anxiety) which included psychological distress as its preregistered primary outcome. Across 41 models, whether or not an association was detected as well as the shape and direction of this association varied. Although several models indicated that higher dosage was associated with larger decreases in psychological distress, many models failed to show this relationship and some even showed the opposite. These results may have implications for optimizing and studying dosage in meditation apps and for open science practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241266567
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Dosage of a Meditation App Associated With Changes in Psychological Distress? It Depends on How You Ask

Simon Benjamin Goldberg, Inbal Billie Nahum-Shani, Cortland J. Dahl, Richard J. Davidson et al.
14 citations
Clinical Psychological Science
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
8.95
article

Is Dosage of a Meditation App Associated With Changes in Psychological Distress? It Depends on How You Ask

Simon Benjamin Goldberg, Inbal Billie Nahum-Shani, Cortland J. Dahl, Richard J. Davidson, Ashley D. Kendall, Bethany C. Bray, Matthew James Hirshberg
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Despite growing popularity, associations between dosage and outcomes in meditation app interventions have not been established. We examined this relationship using a range of operationalizations of dosage (e.g., minutes of use, days of use, number and type of activities completed) and strategies for modeling outcomes (e.g., ordinary least squares regression, multilevel modeling, latent class analysis). We used data from a recently completed randomized controlled trial testing a meditation app (<i>n</i>=662; 80.4% with elevated depression/anxiety) which included psychological distress as its preregistered primary outcome. Across 41 models, whether or not an association was detected as well as the shape and direction of this association varied. Although several models indicated that higher dosage was associated with larger decreases in psychological distress, many models failed to show this relationship and some even showed the opposite. These results may have implications for optimizing and studying dosage in meditation apps and for open science practices.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Health Innovations (United States) (US)
Spencer Foundation, Hope for Depression Research Foundation, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Cancer Institute, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
8.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.