Using <i>personal health records</i> for medication continuity during transition of care: An observational study

<b>Background:</b> National Personal Health Records (PHRs) have been proposed to improve the transfer of medication-related information during transition of care. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the concordance between the medications captured in the Australian national PHR, My Health Record (MyHR), and the pharmacist obtained best possible medication history (BPMH) for patients upon hospital admission. <b>Method:</b> This prospective observational study used a convenience sample of hospital patients. For newly admitted patients, the investigating pharmacist obtained a BPMH and then compared it to the medication list captured in MyHR. Upon comparison, the medications were categorised into either complete match, partial match or mismatch. Medications with a complete or partial match were grouped together. Medications with deviations were then assessed for risk based on their potential consequence, and reported descriptively. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the factors associated with a drug being mismatched. <b>Results:</b> A total of 82 patients were recruited, with a cumulative total of 1,207 medications documented. Of the 1,207 medications, 714 (59.2%) medications were documented as a complete/partial match. The remaining 493 (40.8%) medications were mismatched. Of the 493 mismatched medications, 442 (89.7%) were deemed low-risk deviations and 51 (10.3%) were deemed high-risk. A medication was more likely to be mismatched, rather than completely/partially matched, if it was a regular non-prescription medication, or "when-required" prescription medication, or "when required" non-prescription medication, or if it was administered parenterally. <b>Conclusion:</b> National PHRs may be a secondary source to either confirm a patient's medication history or be used as a starting point for a BPMH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Information Management Journal
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241270215
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using personal health records for medication continuity during transition of care: An observational study

Meredith Makeham, Asad E. Patanwala, Jonathan Penm, M. J. O. Francis et al.
Health Information Management Journal
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Using personal health records for medication continuity during transition of care: An observational study

Meredith Makeham, Asad E. Patanwala, Jonathan Penm, M. J. O. Francis, Melissa Baysari, Peter J. Francis
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> National Personal Health Records (PHRs) have been proposed to improve the transfer of medication-related information during transition of care. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the concordance between the medications captured in the Australian national PHR, My Health Record (MyHR), and the pharmacist obtained best possible medication history (BPMH) for patients upon hospital admission. <b>Method:</b> This prospective observational study used a convenience sample of hospital patients. For newly admitted patients, the investigating pharmacist obtained a BPMH and then compared it to the medication list captured in MyHR. Upon comparison, the medications were categorised into either complete match, partial match or mismatch. Medications with a complete or partial match were grouped together. Medications with deviations were then assessed for risk based on their potential consequence, and reported descriptively. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the factors associated with a drug being mismatched. <b>Results:</b> A total of 82 patients were recruited, with a cumulative total of 1,207 medications documented. Of the 1,207 medications, 714 (59.2%) medications were documented as a complete/partial match. The remaining 493 (40.8%) medications were mismatched. Of the 493 mismatched medications, 442 (89.7%) were deemed low-risk deviations and 51 (10.3%) were deemed high-risk. A medication was more likely to be mismatched, rather than completely/partially matched, if it was a regular non-prescription medication, or "when-required" prescription medication, or "when required" non-prescription medication, or if it was administered parenterally. <b>Conclusion:</b> National PHRs may be a secondary source to either confirm a patient's medication history or be used as a starting point for a BPMH.

Health Information Management JournalVol. 54(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Blacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital (AU), Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.