Assessment of chemical contamination by cancer drugs during use of the RIVA <sup>TM</sup> compounding robot: A pilot study

IntroductionMany hospitals are now investing in robotic compounding system for the preparation of cytotoxic agents. The objective of the present study was to describe contamination by cytotoxics inside and outside the RIVA<sup>TM</sup> robot (ARxIUM, Winnipeg, Canada).Material & MethodsWe applied a risk analysis to determine which locations inside and outside the compounding robot should be monitored. Samples were collected by swabbing with a wet swab (using 0.1 mL of sterile water) before the robots was cleaned. Ten cytotoxics compounded with the robot were screened for using LC-MS/MS. We determined the percentage contamination rates inside (CR<sub>in</sub>) and outside (CR<sub>out</sub>) the robot and the amounts of each contaminant (in ng/cm²). If a sample was found to be positive, a corrective action was implemented.ResultsOur risk analysis highlighted 10 locations inside the robot and 7 outside. Ten sampling campaigns (10 samples per campaign) were performed. The mean CR<sub>in</sub> (40%) was significantly higher than the mean CR<sub>out</sub> (2%; p < 10<sup>-4</sup>). Gemcitabine and cyclophosphamide were the main contaminants. After the implementation of corrective measures (such as daily cleaning with SDS/isopropyl alcohol), the CR<sub>in</sub> fell from 60% to 10%.Discussion/conclusionThe frequency of contamination was lower for robotic compounding than for manual compounding in an isolator. However, robotic compounding tended to generated larger mean amounts of contaminant; this was related to incidents such as splashing when syringes were disposed of after the compounding. The implementation of corrective actions effectively reduced the CRs. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241276530
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of chemical contamination by cancer drugs during use of the RIVA TM compounding robot: A pilot study

Justin Courtin, Delphine Allorge, Marine Pinturaud, Nicolas Beauval et al.
1 citations
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
1.72
article

Assessment of chemical contamination by cancer drugs during use of the RIVA TM compounding robot: A pilot study

Justin Courtin, Delphine Allorge, Marine Pinturaud, Nicolas Beauval, Michèle Vasseur, Myriam Bouchfaa, Nicolas Simon, Pascal Odou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionMany hospitals are now investing in robotic compounding system for the preparation of cytotoxic agents. The objective of the present study was to describe contamination by cytotoxics inside and outside the RIVA<sup>TM</sup> robot (ARxIUM, Winnipeg, Canada).Material & MethodsWe applied a risk analysis to determine which locations inside and outside the compounding robot should be monitored. Samples were collected by swabbing with a wet swab (using 0.1 mL of sterile water) before the robots was cleaned. Ten cytotoxics compounded with the robot were screened for using LC-MS/MS. We determined the percentage contamination rates inside (CR<sub>in</sub>) and outside (CR<sub>out</sub>) the robot and the amounts of each contaminant (in ng/cm²). If a sample was found to be positive, a corrective action was implemented.ResultsOur risk analysis highlighted 10 locations inside the robot and 7 outside. Ten sampling campaigns (10 samples per campaign) were performed. The mean CR<sub>in</sub> (40%) was significantly higher than the mean CR<sub>out</sub> (2%; p < 10<sup>-4</sup>). Gemcitabine and cyclophosphamide were the main contaminants. After the implementation of corrective measures (such as daily cleaning with SDS/isopropyl alcohol), the CR<sub>in</sub> fell from 60% to 10%.Discussion/conclusionThe frequency of contamination was lower for robotic compounding than for manual compounding in an isolator. However, robotic compounding tended to generated larger mean amounts of contaminant; this was related to incidents such as splashing when syringes were disposed of after the compounding. The implementation of corrective actions effectively reduced the CRs. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm these results.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy PracticeVol. 31(7)
Université de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Institut de Biologie de Lille (FR), IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine (FR), Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.