Makhnovshchina

This article attempts to systematize the knowledge available in historiography on the history of the peasant movement in Ukraine during the Civil War, known as the Makhnovshchina.The emphasis is placed on the most important aspects of the problem, which allow us to better understand the phenomenon of Makhnovshchina in the context of the all-Russian peasant insurgency in the period under review.In particular, the article examines the controversial issue in historiography about the degree of influence of anarchists on the Makhnovshchina.Based on an analysis of numerous and reliable sources, it is concluded that this influence was undoubtedly, first of all, due to the commitment to the ideas of anarchism by Makhno himself and the participation in the Makhnovshchina of a significant number of anarchists.But the movement itself, from the moment of its inception until the very end, remained peasant, arising on its own soil, as a negative reaction of the peasantry to the anti-peasant policy of the Bolsheviks in Ukraine: surplus appropriation, abuse of the Cheka, establishment of state farms, etc. Makhnovshchina was not a counter-revolutionary and "gangster movement", as Bolshevik propaganda claimed.The Makhnovists advocated "free councils", people's self-government, and against the forcible imposition from above in Ukraine of emergency organs of Soviet power: the Cheka, revolutionary committees, etc.The main difference between the Makhnovshchina and other peasant insurgent movements in Russia during the Civil War was the creation of a combat-ready, regular peasant army on wheels (carts).In alliance with the Red Army, she heroically fought against the Whites, as well as the Petliurists.All Bolshevik accusations against Makhno and his units of betrayal and treason are not confirmed by the sources studied by the authors of the article.The conflict between the Makhnovists and the Soviet government was determined by Makhno's reluctance to implement the policy of "war communism" in the territory of Ukraine controlled by his army, as well as to submit to the emergency authorities created there without the participation of the local population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Courier
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31518/2618-9100-2024-4-11
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Makhnovshchina

Viktor V. Kondrashin
Historical Courier
Soviet and Russian History
article

Makhnovshchina

Viktor V. Kondrashin
article en

Abstract

This article attempts to systematize the knowledge available in historiography on the history of the peasant movement in Ukraine during the Civil War, known as the Makhnovshchina.The emphasis is placed on the most important aspects of the problem, which allow us to better understand the phenomenon of Makhnovshchina in the context of the all-Russian peasant insurgency in the period under review.In particular, the article examines the controversial issue in historiography about the degree of influence of anarchists on the Makhnovshchina.Based on an analysis of numerous and reliable sources, it is concluded that this influence was undoubtedly, first of all, due to the commitment to the ideas of anarchism by Makhno himself and the participation in the Makhnovshchina of a significant number of anarchists.But the movement itself, from the moment of its inception until the very end, remained peasant, arising on its own soil, as a negative reaction of the peasantry to the anti-peasant policy of the Bolsheviks in Ukraine: surplus appropriation, abuse of the Cheka, establishment of state farms, etc. Makhnovshchina was not a counter-revolutionary and "gangster movement", as Bolshevik propaganda claimed.The Makhnovists advocated "free councils", people's self-government, and against the forcible imposition from above in Ukraine of emergency organs of Soviet power: the Cheka, revolutionary committees, etc.The main difference between the Makhnovshchina and other peasant insurgent movements in Russia during the Civil War was the creation of a combat-ready, regular peasant army on wheels (carts).In alliance with the Red Army, she heroically fought against the Whites, as well as the Petliurists.All Bolshevik accusations against Makhno and his units of betrayal and treason are not confirmed by the sources studied by the authors of the article.The conflict between the Makhnovists and the Soviet government was determined by Makhno's reluctance to implement the policy of "war communism" in the territory of Ukraine controlled by his army, as well as to submit to the emergency authorities created there without the participation of the local population.

Historical Courier(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.