BOIKOT PRODUK ISRAEL DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN YANG DILARANG DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NO 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT

Boycotting business competition is one of the prohibited agreements. The close historical relationship between Indonesia and Palestine means that Indonesia continues to support Palestinian independence. One of the most prominent reactions to this conflict was the boycott of Israeli products. Companies such as Danone and Coca-Cola, Starbucks which are affected by the boycott must make it clear to the public that the boycott actions that have been carried out so far are not in the context of business competition and do not violate Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Competition. Unhealthy business but commitment to humanity. The call for a boycott is just fanaticism without a religious connection because companies that come to Indonesia only want to invest

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v7i2.1164
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BOIKOT PRODUK ISRAEL DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN YANG DILARANG DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NO 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT

Anak Agung Adi Lestari, Agustina Ni Made Ayu Darma Pratiwi, Ni Made Rai Sukardi
Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha
Legal Studies and Policies
article

BOIKOT PRODUK ISRAEL DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN YANG DILARANG DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NO 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT

Anak Agung Adi Lestari, Agustina Ni Made Ayu Darma Pratiwi, Ni Made Rai Sukardi
article en

Abstract

Boycotting business competition is one of the prohibited agreements. The close historical relationship between Indonesia and Palestine means that Indonesia continues to support Palestinian independence. One of the most prominent reactions to this conflict was the boycott of Israeli products. Companies such as Danone and Coca-Cola, Starbucks which are affected by the boycott must make it clear to the public that the boycott actions that have been carried out so far are not in the context of business competition and do not violate Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Competition. Unhealthy business but commitment to humanity. The call for a boycott is just fanaticism without a religious connection because companies that come to Indonesia only want to invest

Jurnal Ilmiah Raad KerthaVol. 7(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.