Investment strategies to maintain the state of water networks

Purpose: This article focuses on the problem of deciding the annual investment that a company should allocate to the rehabilitation of its water distribution and sanitation networks. The objective is to find the investment amount necessary to maintain an adequate quality and sustainability of the infrastructure. It is not a simple decision, as there are different criteria that may be of interest to the managing company. In this paper, we consider four criteria related to the reliability of individual pipes and the complete network. These indicators are the infrastructure value index, the average age of network pipes, the risk index and the probability of failure.Design/methodology/approach: A methodology is proposed to estimate the best annual investment by analysing the evolution of these indicators. Concretely, two strategies are tested. The first one is a minimax-based approach that seeks a balanced solution for all the indicators. The second one is named as minimal deviation strategy and seeks to minimise the deviation of all the indicators in the last year of the time horizon compared to the initial year.Findings: In order to obtain a realistic sample of the performance of both strategies, 201 scenarios, i.e. 201 different annual investments have been tested. According to the first strategy, an annual investment of 55.5 M€ is the best option, while the minimal deviation strategy presents an annual investment of 39.5 M€ as the best decision. The study reveals that different evaluation functions lead to completely different annual investment. Concretely, the minimax evaluation function is more conservative than the minimal deviation strategy.Originality/value: This study proposes an original approach to address the decision problem of investments in asset management. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first attempt to treat that problem using this kind of evaluation functions. However, it is still a simple proposal and there are many options to continue this line of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.7082
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investment strategies to maintain the state of water networks

Alicia Robles‐Velasco, Luis Onieva, Pablo Cortés, Pablo Aparicio-Ruiz
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
article

Investment strategies to maintain the state of water networks

Alicia Robles‐Velasco, Luis Onieva, Pablo Cortés, Pablo Aparicio-Ruiz
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This article focuses on the problem of deciding the annual investment that a company should allocate to the rehabilitation of its water distribution and sanitation networks. The objective is to find the investment amount necessary to maintain an adequate quality and sustainability of the infrastructure. It is not a simple decision, as there are different criteria that may be of interest to the managing company. In this paper, we consider four criteria related to the reliability of individual pipes and the complete network. These indicators are the infrastructure value index, the average age of network pipes, the risk index and the probability of failure.Design/methodology/approach: A methodology is proposed to estimate the best annual investment by analysing the evolution of these indicators. Concretely, two strategies are tested. The first one is a minimax-based approach that seeks a balanced solution for all the indicators. The second one is named as minimal deviation strategy and seeks to minimise the deviation of all the indicators in the last year of the time horizon compared to the initial year.Findings: In order to obtain a realistic sample of the performance of both strategies, 201 scenarios, i.e. 201 different annual investments have been tested. According to the first strategy, an annual investment of 55.5 M€ is the best option, while the minimal deviation strategy presents an annual investment of 39.5 M€ as the best decision. The study reveals that different evaluation functions lead to completely different annual investment. Concretely, the minimax evaluation function is more conservative than the minimal deviation strategy.Originality/value: This study proposes an original approach to address the decision problem of investments in asset management. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first attempt to treat that problem using this kind of evaluation functions. However, it is still a simple proposal and there are many options to continue this line of research.

Journal of Industrial Engineering and ManagementVol. 17(3)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Junta de Andalucía, European Regional Development Fund, H2020 European Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.