Evaluating the Efficacy of GARCH Models in Forecasting Volatility Dynamics Across Major Global Financial Indices: A Decade-long Analysis

This study investigates the volatility dynamics of five major global financial indices—FTSE 100, Hang Seng, NIKKEI 225, NSE 50, and S&P 500—using a range of GARCH models over a ten-year period from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2023. The analysis involves preprocessing the data to ensure stationarity, calculating log returns, and conducting stationarity and ARCH effect LM tests. Various GARCH models, including GARCH (0,1), GARCH (1,1), GARCH (1,2), and GARCH (2,2), are applied to capture and forecast volatility. The study aims to determine the most effective model for accurately reflecting volatility dynamics while accounting for significant market events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings reveal that the GARCH (1,1) model generally provides a robust balance between model simplicity and statistical significance, effectively capturing the time-varying volatility of the indices. Despite some complex models offering better fit measures according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwarz Criterion (SC), the GARCH (1,1) model consistently demonstrates significant parameter estimates and reliable predictive performance, as evidenced by consistent Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) values. This suggests that the GARCH (1,1) model is a preferred choice for volatility forecasting due to its effectiveness and parsimony, although future research might explore more advanced GARCH model variations for further refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics Management and Trade
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2024/v30i91238
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Efficacy of GARCH Models in Forecasting Volatility Dynamics Across Major Global Financial Indices: A Decade-long Analysis

Nagendra Marisetty
2 citations
Journal of Economics Management and Trade
Market Dynamics and Volatility
2.26
article

Evaluating the Efficacy of GARCH Models in Forecasting Volatility Dynamics Across Major Global Financial Indices: A Decade-long Analysis

Nagendra Marisetty
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the volatility dynamics of five major global financial indices—FTSE 100, Hang Seng, NIKKEI 225, NSE 50, and S&P 500—using a range of GARCH models over a ten-year period from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2023. The analysis involves preprocessing the data to ensure stationarity, calculating log returns, and conducting stationarity and ARCH effect LM tests. Various GARCH models, including GARCH (0,1), GARCH (1,1), GARCH (1,2), and GARCH (2,2), are applied to capture and forecast volatility. The study aims to determine the most effective model for accurately reflecting volatility dynamics while accounting for significant market events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings reveal that the GARCH (1,1) model generally provides a robust balance between model simplicity and statistical significance, effectively capturing the time-varying volatility of the indices. Despite some complex models offering better fit measures according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwarz Criterion (SC), the GARCH (1,1) model consistently demonstrates significant parameter estimates and reliable predictive performance, as evidenced by consistent Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) values. This suggests that the GARCH (1,1) model is a preferred choice for volatility forecasting due to its effectiveness and parsimony, although future research might explore more advanced GARCH model variations for further refinement.

Journal of Economics Management and TradeVol. 30(9)
REVA University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.