Parallels between the Development of the Culture-Area Concept and “Economic and Technical Areas” in the 1920s–1930s

The article examines the development of the “culture area” concept in American cultural anthropology and that of “economic-cultural type” in Soviet ethnography in the 1920s–1930s. Three stages of development of the concepts have been outlined: 1) the 1890s–1910s, during which the concepts of areal/territorial studies received their initial design; the masterpiece of the period was “The American Indian” by C. Wissler (1917); 2) the 1920s, when the concepts were theoretically substantiated; 3) the 1930s, when discussion of the topic ceased in the USSR, while in the USA the concept of culture area was criticized by A. Kroeber for the lack of historicism. The article highlights the features of each national school: historicism in the USSR and consistent empiricism in the USA. It is also indicated that a number of provisions of the ECT/CA concepts in the pre-war period did not receive sufficient coverage: the relationship between environmental and cultural factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Etnograficheskoe obozrenie
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31857/s0869541524020025
Primary Topic
Global Political and Economic Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parallels between the Development of the Culture-Area Concept and “Economic and Technical Areas” in the 1920s–1930s

Andrey Vladimirovich Tutorskiy
Etnograficheskoe obozrenie
Global Political and Economic Relations
article

Parallels between the Development of the Culture-Area Concept and “Economic and Technical Areas” in the 1920s–1930s

Andrey Vladimirovich Tutorskiy
article en

Abstract

The article examines the development of the “culture area” concept in American cultural anthropology and that of “economic-cultural type” in Soviet ethnography in the 1920s–1930s. Three stages of development of the concepts have been outlined: 1) the 1890s–1910s, during which the concepts of areal/territorial studies received their initial design; the masterpiece of the period was “The American Indian” by C. Wissler (1917); 2) the 1920s, when the concepts were theoretically substantiated; 3) the 1930s, when discussion of the topic ceased in the USSR, while in the USA the concept of culture area was criticized by A. Kroeber for the lack of historicism. The article highlights the features of each national school: historicism in the USSR and consistent empiricism in the USA. It is also indicated that a number of provisions of the ECT/CA concepts in the pre-war period did not receive sufficient coverage: the relationship between environmental and cultural factors.

Etnograficheskoe obozrenie(2)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (CN), Moscow State University (TJ), Institute of Ethnology (HU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Global Political and Economic Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parallels between the Development of the Culture-Area Concept and “Economic and Technical Areas” in the 1920s–1930s — Andrey Vladimirovich Tutorskiy · Etnograficheskoe obozrenie (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS