Investigating the Impact of Control in AI-Assisted Decision-Making - An Experimental Study

We ask whether users should adjust to AI systems or vice versa. Levels of automation (LOAs) are task dependent, may vary within one task, and also may change over time. People’s diverse abilities and preferences make the usage of AI systems possibly personal. Automation design is a complicated task. We investigate varying levels of LOAs in one specific decision-making process. For this, we conduct an experiment, where n=24 volunteers participate in a within-subject face-recognition experiment. Face-recognition is an innate ability mastered by humans. Reason are specialized neurological systems. This also makes it an intuitive task. The results show that of the five tested LOAs, each one leads to personal best and personal worst decisions regarding accuracy and time. Similarly, each LOA is preferred or opposed by participants. This shows, that there is no “one-size-fits-all” LOA, suggesting that careful design is required and multiple LOAs should be offered for a task.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3670653.3677476
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Impact of Control in AI-Assisted Decision-Making - An Experimental Study

Christian Meske, Erdi Ünal
2 citations
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
0.98
article

Investigating the Impact of Control in AI-Assisted Decision-Making - An Experimental Study

Christian Meske, Erdi Ünal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We ask whether users should adjust to AI systems or vice versa. Levels of automation (LOAs) are task dependent, may vary within one task, and also may change over time. People’s diverse abilities and preferences make the usage of AI systems possibly personal. Automation design is a complicated task. We investigate varying levels of LOAs in one specific decision-making process. For this, we conduct an experiment, where n=24 volunteers participate in a within-subject face-recognition experiment. Face-recognition is an innate ability mastered by humans. Reason are specialized neurological systems. This also makes it an intuitive task. The results show that of the five tested LOAs, each one leads to personal best and personal worst decisions regarding accuracy and time. Similarly, each LOA is preferred or opposed by participants. This shows, that there is no “one-size-fits-all” LOA, suggesting that careful design is required and multiple LOAs should be offered for a task.

Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.