Utility of Extraction-Free SARS-CoV-2 Detection by RT–qPCR for COVID-19 Testing in a Resource-Limited Setting

The COVID-19 epidemic had a profound impact on global health and the economy and Ghana was no exception to its far-reaching consequences. Regarding detection of the causative agent-the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), reverse-transcription-qPCR (RT-qPCR) is widely recognized as a very sensitive and reliable diagnostic technique used globally. There are, however, high operational costs in acquiring test kits, equipment, and accessories for RT-qPCR testing, which pose significant challenges in resource-limited settings. Hence, this proof-of-concept study set out to develop a more affordable COVID-19 protocol for use in low or lower-middle-income settings, such as Ghana, that would bypass the traditional extraction process using inexpensive reagents and evaluate the possibility of processing samples collected using wooden shaft swabs. Several less expensive media were used for the extraction-free process. Results demonstrated that direct RT-qPCR assay after 5 min heat inactivation of virus at 95 °C in 0.1× PBS or molecular grade water resulted in viral detection with quantification cycle (Cq) values that are comparable to results obtained following the extraction process. Also, wooden shaft swabs could be used for sampling if incubation times are kept to less than 6 h. The study demonstrates that extraction-free protocols are one way to minimize the cost of COVID-19 testing by RT-qPCR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12090198
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of Extraction-Free SARS-CoV-2 Detection by RT–qPCR for COVID-19 Testing in a Resource-Limited Setting

Isaac Kofi Yankson, Anna Aba Kafintu-kwashie, Akua K. Yalley, Nicholas Israel Nii-Trebi et al.
Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

Utility of Extraction-Free SARS-CoV-2 Detection by RT–qPCR for COVID-19 Testing in a Resource-Limited Setting

Isaac Kofi Yankson, Anna Aba Kafintu-kwashie, Akua K. Yalley, Nicholas Israel Nii-Trebi, Selasie Ahiatrogah, Peter Gmagna, Iddrisu I. Moro
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic had a profound impact on global health and the economy and Ghana was no exception to its far-reaching consequences. Regarding detection of the causative agent-the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), reverse-transcription-qPCR (RT-qPCR) is widely recognized as a very sensitive and reliable diagnostic technique used globally. There are, however, high operational costs in acquiring test kits, equipment, and accessories for RT-qPCR testing, which pose significant challenges in resource-limited settings. Hence, this proof-of-concept study set out to develop a more affordable COVID-19 protocol for use in low or lower-middle-income settings, such as Ghana, that would bypass the traditional extraction process using inexpensive reagents and evaluate the possibility of processing samples collected using wooden shaft swabs. Several less expensive media were used for the extraction-free process. Results demonstrated that direct RT-qPCR assay after 5 min heat inactivation of virus at 95 °C in 0.1× PBS or molecular grade water resulted in viral detection with quantification cycle (Cq) values that are comparable to results obtained following the extraction process. Also, wooden shaft swabs could be used for sampling if incubation times are kept to less than 6 h. The study demonstrates that extraction-free protocols are one way to minimize the cost of COVID-19 testing by RT-qPCR.

DiseasesVol. 12(9)
University of Ghana (GH), University of Ibadan (NG), Accra Technical University (GH), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (GH), Pan-Atlantic University (NG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.