You Can Only Verify When You Know the Answer: Feature-Based Explanations Reduce Overreliance on AI for Easy Decisions, but Not for Hard Ones

Explaining the mechanisms behind model predictions is a common strategy in AI-assisted decision-making to help users rely appropriately on AI. However, recent research shows that the effectiveness of explanations depends on numerous factors, leading to mixed results, with many studies finding no effect or even an increase in overreliance, while explanations do improve appropriate reliance in other studies. We consider the factor of decision difficulty to better understand when feature-based explanations can mitigate overreliance. To this end, we conducted an online experiment (N = 200) with carefully selected task instances that cover a wide range of difficulties. We found that explanations reduce overreliance for easy decisions, but that this effect vanishes with increasing decision difficulty. For the most difficult decisions, explanations might even increase overreliance. Our results imply that explanations of the model’s inner workings are only helpful for a limited set of decision tasks where users easily know the answer themselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3670653.3670660
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You Can Only Verify When You Know the Answer: Feature-Based Explanations Reduce Overreliance on AI for Easy Decisions, but Not for Hard Ones

Zelun Tony Zhang, Yuanting Liu, Felicitas Buchner, Andreas Butz
6 citations
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.08
article

You Can Only Verify When You Know the Answer: Feature-Based Explanations Reduce Overreliance on AI for Easy Decisions, but Not for Hard Ones

Zelun Tony Zhang, Yuanting Liu, Felicitas Buchner, Andreas Butz
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Explaining the mechanisms behind model predictions is a common strategy in AI-assisted decision-making to help users rely appropriately on AI. However, recent research shows that the effectiveness of explanations depends on numerous factors, leading to mixed results, with many studies finding no effect or even an increase in overreliance, while explanations do improve appropriate reliance in other studies. We consider the factor of decision difficulty to better understand when feature-based explanations can mitigate overreliance. To this end, we conducted an online experiment (N = 200) with carefully selected task instances that cover a wide range of difficulties. We found that explanations reduce overreliance for easy decisions, but that this effect vanishes with increasing decision difficulty. For the most difficult decisions, explanations might even increase overreliance. Our results imply that explanations of the model’s inner workings are only helpful for a limited set of decision tasks where users easily know the answer themselves.

LMU Klinikum (DE), Fortiss (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.