What does it Take to Test a Bicycle Simulator for Realism? A Discussion of the Challenges and Possible Evaluation Methods

In recent years, bicycle simulators have become increasingly important as a research tool, resulting in a large number of new prototypes at various academic institutions. In order for the results of studies to be transferred from a simulator to reality, it is necessary to ensure that simulators reproduce realistic traffic behaviour. Most bicycle simulators are evaluated using cycling parameters. However, the (combined) use of other methods is necessary to ensure realism. In this paper we present a variety of evaluation methods and discuss why we consider them relevant for evaluating the realism. We present the challenges and potential and the study design of our current study comparing cycling behaviour in reality and in simulation. Our study design should serve as a reference for other researchers and facilitate their own research. This paper contributes to the motivation of new and future work in the still young field of cycling simulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3670653.3677491
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What does it Take to Test a Bicycle Simulator for Realism? A Discussion of the Challenges and Possible Evaluation Methods

Jochen Eckart, Mathias Trefzger, Michael Raschke, Michael Fath
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

What does it Take to Test a Bicycle Simulator for Realism? A Discussion of the Challenges and Possible Evaluation Methods

Jochen Eckart, Mathias Trefzger, Michael Raschke, Michael Fath
article en

Abstract

In recent years, bicycle simulators have become increasingly important as a research tool, resulting in a large number of new prototypes at various academic institutions. In order for the results of studies to be transferred from a simulator to reality, it is necessary to ensure that simulators reproduce realistic traffic behaviour. Most bicycle simulators are evaluated using cycling parameters. However, the (combined) use of other methods is necessary to ensure realism. In this paper we present a variety of evaluation methods and discuss why we consider them relevant for evaluating the realism. We present the challenges and potential and the study design of our current study comparing cycling behaviour in reality and in simulation. Our study design should serve as a reference for other researchers and facilitate their own research. This paper contributes to the motivation of new and future work in the still young field of cycling simulation.

Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What does it Take to Test a Bicycle Simulator for Realism? A Discussion of the Challenges and Possible Evaluation Methods — Jochen Eckart, Mathias Trefzger, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS