Corrections of Electron–Phonon Coupling for Second‐Order Structural Phase Transitions

Structural phase transitions are accompanied by a movement of one nucleus (or a few) in the crystallographic unit cell. If the nucleus movement is continuous, a second‐order phase transition without latent heat results, whereas an abrupt nucleus displacement indicates a first‐order phase transition with accompanying latent heat. Herein, a Hamiltonian including electron – phonon coupling (EPC) as proposed by Kristoffel and Konsel is taken. Contrary to their treatment, both the kinetic energy of the nucleus and its position are treated. The interaction of the many‐electron system with the single nucleus is taken into account by the Born – Oppenheimer approximation and perturbative expressions for the free energies are derived. The nuclei corrections due to the entangled electrons are found to be minor, but highlight the importance of the symmetry breaking at low temperature. Furthermore the free energy for a canonical ensemble is computed, whereas Kristoffel and Konsel use a grand canonical ensemble, which allows to derive more stringent bounds on the free energy. For the zero‐order nucleus correction, the shift of the phase transition temperature by evaluating the free energy is deduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
physica status solidi (b)
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202400139
Primary Topic
Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corrections of Electron–Phonon Coupling for Second‐Order Structural Phase Transitions

Kurt Hingerl, Mario Graml
physica status solidi (b)
Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
article

Corrections of Electron–Phonon Coupling for Second‐Order Structural Phase Transitions

Kurt Hingerl, Mario Graml
article en

Abstract

Structural phase transitions are accompanied by a movement of one nucleus (or a few) in the crystallographic unit cell. If the nucleus movement is continuous, a second‐order phase transition without latent heat results, whereas an abrupt nucleus displacement indicates a first‐order phase transition with accompanying latent heat. Herein, a Hamiltonian including electron – phonon coupling (EPC) as proposed by Kristoffel and Konsel is taken. Contrary to their treatment, both the kinetic energy of the nucleus and its position are treated. The interaction of the many‐electron system with the single nucleus is taken into account by the Born – Oppenheimer approximation and perturbative expressions for the free energies are derived. The nuclei corrections due to the entangled electrons are found to be minor, but highlight the importance of the symmetry breaking at low temperature. Furthermore the free energy for a canonical ensemble is computed, whereas Kristoffel and Konsel use a grand canonical ensemble, which allows to derive more stringent bounds on the free energy. For the zero‐order nucleus correction, the shift of the phase transition temperature by evaluating the free energy is deduced.

physica status solidi (b)Vol. 262(10)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.