Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

ABSTRACT A firm’s initial public offering (IPO) generates negative externalities for industry competitors. To mitigate this threat, incumbent firms manage their earnings downward, issue more negative management forecasts, and use a more negative disclosure tone when their industry peers file for an IPO. Negative accruals reverse when the threat subsides. Incumbents manage earnings more aggressively when costs are small and benefits are large, and when they follow negative disclosures of industry leading incumbents. Such strategic disclosure lowers incumbent firm valuation multiples and associates with more negative IPO firm media sentiment. IPO firms obtain lower offer prices, raise less capital, and are more likely to withdraw from the offering. They also invest less, hoard more cash, and experience lower profitability post-IPO, whereas incumbents experience higher profitability and market share growth. Our results highlight the role of strategic reporting on product market competition and identify a new cost of going public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2021-0447
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

Matthew T. Billett, Mark Ma, Xiaoyun Yu
4 citations
The Accounting Review
Private Equity and Venture Capital
3.78
article

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

Matthew T. Billett, Mark Ma, Xiaoyun Yu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT A firm’s initial public offering (IPO) generates negative externalities for industry competitors. To mitigate this threat, incumbent firms manage their earnings downward, issue more negative management forecasts, and use a more negative disclosure tone when their industry peers file for an IPO. Negative accruals reverse when the threat subsides. Incumbents manage earnings more aggressively when costs are small and benefits are large, and when they follow negative disclosures of industry leading incumbents. Such strategic disclosure lowers incumbent firm valuation multiples and associates with more negative IPO firm media sentiment. IPO firms obtain lower offer prices, raise less capital, and are more likely to withdraw from the offering. They also invest less, hoard more cash, and experience lower profitability post-IPO, whereas incumbents experience higher profitability and market share growth. Our results highlight the role of strategic reporting on product market competition and identify a new cost of going public.

The Accounting ReviewVol. 99(6)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
3.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO — Matthew T. Billett, Mark Ma, et al. · The Accounting Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS