Social capital and economic growth: A meta‐analysis

Abstract This research provides a comprehensive, quantitative synthesis of the empirical literature on social capital and economic growth. It assesses 957 estimates from 83 studies. While our preferred estimate of the overall mean effect is close to zero and statistically insignificant, the main finding of our analysis is the substantial degree of effect heterogeneity. We find that social capital effects can range from large negative to large positive, suggesting that its impact on economic growth varies substantially depending on the context. However, our investigation was unable to trace the sources of this heterogeneity to any observable data, estimation, and study characteristics. This suggests that other factors, not included in our study, are responsible. Our analysis did uncover significant publication bias, indicating that the estimates of social capital's effects in the empirical literature are overstated. A further finding from our analysis is that we found no evidence that different types of social capital have different effects on economic growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Surveys
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12660
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social capital and economic growth: A meta‐analysis

Robbie C. M. van Aert, W. Robert Reed, Xindong Xue
4 citations
Journal of Economic Surveys
Social Capital and Networks
4.53
article

Social capital and economic growth: A meta‐analysis

Robbie C. M. van Aert, W. Robert Reed, Xindong Xue
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This research provides a comprehensive, quantitative synthesis of the empirical literature on social capital and economic growth. It assesses 957 estimates from 83 studies. While our preferred estimate of the overall mean effect is close to zero and statistically insignificant, the main finding of our analysis is the substantial degree of effect heterogeneity. We find that social capital effects can range from large negative to large positive, suggesting that its impact on economic growth varies substantially depending on the context. However, our investigation was unable to trace the sources of this heterogeneity to any observable data, estimation, and study characteristics. This suggests that other factors, not included in our study, are responsible. Our analysis did uncover significant publication bias, indicating that the estimates of social capital's effects in the empirical literature are overstated. A further finding from our analysis is that we found no evidence that different types of social capital have different effects on economic growth.

Journal of Economic SurveysVol. 39(4)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), University of Canterbury (NZ), Tilburg University (NL)
Grantová Agentura České Republiky, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, National Social Science Fund of China
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Capital and Networks
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.