<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math>-inflation: The legitimacy of the classical treatment

In this paper we consider a general theory of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>k</a:mi></a:math>-inflation and find out that it may be in a strong coupling regime. We derive accurate conditions of classical description validity using unitarity bounds for this model. Next, we choose a simple toy model of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>k</c:mi></c:math>-inflation and obtain the explicit condition, which guarantees that the generation of perturbations is performed in a controllable way, i.e., the exit from the effective horizon occurs in the weak coupling regime. However, for the same toy model the corresponding experimental bounds on a nonlinear parameter <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:msubsup><e:mi>f</e:mi><e:mi>NL</e:mi><e:mtext>equil</e:mtext></e:msubsup></e:math> associated with non-Gaussianities of the curvature perturbation provide much stronger constraint than strong coupling absence condition. Nevertheless, for other known models of inflation this may not be the case. Generally, one should always check if classical description is legitimate for chosen models of inflation. Published by the American Physical Society 2024