Ensemble of artificial intelligence and physically based models for rainfall–runoff modeling in the upper Blue Nile Basin

ABSTRACT This study investigated the performance of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), feed forward neural network (FFNN), Soil and Water Analysis Tool (SWAT), Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydraulic Modeling System (HEC-HMS), Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV), and support vector regression (SVR) models for rainfall–runoff modeling using gauged and satellite rainfall, and their fusions in the Gilgel Abay watershed, Ethiopia. Afterward, simple average ensemble (SAE), weighted average ensemble (WAE), and neural network ensemble (NNE) techniques were applied to combine the outputs of individual models under three scenarios. The performance of the models was evaluated using Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The results demonstrated that the ANFIS model outperformed all the other single models with validation stage NSE values of 0.864 and 0.875, and RMSE values of 23.58 and 21.84 m3/s for gauge and fusion rainfall data, respectively. Among the physical-based models, SWAT gave better modeling performance with the validation stage NSE values of 0.81 and 0.821 for gauge and fusion rainfall data, respectively. Moreover, an ensemble of artificial intelligence and physical-based models greatly improved the overall modeling performance. The NNE improved the performance of single models up to 15.7 and 21.2 5% for fusion and satellite-based rainfall modeling, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology research
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.189
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensemble of artificial intelligence and physically based models for rainfall–runoff modeling in the upper Blue Nile Basin

Gebre Gelete, Tagesse Gichamo, Hüseyin Gökçekuş, Vahid Nourani
8 citations
Hydrology research
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
1.65
article

Ensemble of artificial intelligence and physically based models for rainfall–runoff modeling in the upper Blue Nile Basin

Gebre Gelete, Tagesse Gichamo, Hüseyin Gökçekuş, Vahid Nourani
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated the performance of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), feed forward neural network (FFNN), Soil and Water Analysis Tool (SWAT), Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydraulic Modeling System (HEC-HMS), Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV), and support vector regression (SVR) models for rainfall–runoff modeling using gauged and satellite rainfall, and their fusions in the Gilgel Abay watershed, Ethiopia. Afterward, simple average ensemble (SAE), weighted average ensemble (WAE), and neural network ensemble (NNE) techniques were applied to combine the outputs of individual models under three scenarios. The performance of the models was evaluated using Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The results demonstrated that the ANFIS model outperformed all the other single models with validation stage NSE values of 0.864 and 0.875, and RMSE values of 23.58 and 21.84 m3/s for gauge and fusion rainfall data, respectively. Among the physical-based models, SWAT gave better modeling performance with the validation stage NSE values of 0.81 and 0.821 for gauge and fusion rainfall data, respectively. Moreover, an ensemble of artificial intelligence and physical-based models greatly improved the overall modeling performance. The NNE improved the performance of single models up to 15.7 and 21.2 5% for fusion and satellite-based rainfall modeling, respectively.

Hydrology researchVol. 55(10)
Thi Qar University (IQ), University of Tabriz (IR), Asossa University (ET), Al-Ayen Iraqi University (IQ), Arsi University, Near East University (CY)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
1.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.