Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): A systematic literature review with meta-analysis.

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer (10.2%) with the second highest mortality (9.2%).[1] Up to 14.5% of patients present with synchronous metastases and 12.8% will develop metachronous metastases within 5 years. The treatment for these metastases is resection. [2] In this study we perform a systematic search of the literature about robotic versus laparoscopic liver resections of colorectal liver metastases (CLRM). We include 16 studies. We describe the patient and tumor characteristics. We also describe operation characteristics (rate of major resections, operation time, usage and duration of Pringle, conversion rate, complication rate, R0 margin rate, estimated blood loss, length of stay, mortality and recurrence. Using this data we perform a meta-analysis: no significant difference in operation time was found between robotic and laparoscopic liver resections. There was significantly lower conversion rate, significantly higher R0 margin rate, significantly lower blood loss in the robotic group. We conclude that robotic surgery is promising in the therapy of CRLM. In the future there is need for RCT to compare robotic versus laparoscopic liver surgery for CRLM. Furthermore a longer follow-up is needed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.19.2.0541
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): A systematic literature review with meta-analysis.

Matthieu Decaestecker
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): A systematic literature review with meta-analysis.

Matthieu Decaestecker
article en

Abstract

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer (10.2%) with the second highest mortality (9.2%).[1] Up to 14.5% of patients present with synchronous metastases and 12.8% will develop metachronous metastases within 5 years. The treatment for these metastases is resection. [2] In this study we perform a systematic search of the literature about robotic versus laparoscopic liver resections of colorectal liver metastases (CLRM). We include 16 studies. We describe the patient and tumor characteristics. We also describe operation characteristics (rate of major resections, operation time, usage and duration of Pringle, conversion rate, complication rate, R0 margin rate, estimated blood loss, length of stay, mortality and recurrence. Using this data we perform a meta-analysis: no significant difference in operation time was found between robotic and laparoscopic liver resections. There was significantly lower conversion rate, significantly higher R0 margin rate, significantly lower blood loss in the robotic group. We conclude that robotic surgery is promising in the therapy of CRLM. In the future there is need for RCT to compare robotic versus laparoscopic liver surgery for CRLM. Furthermore a longer follow-up is needed.

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health SciencesVol. 19(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): A systematic literature review with meta-analysis. — Matthieu Decaestecker · World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS