Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems

Creative thinking transforms existing information, either from long-term memory or external sources, into new representations and innovative ideas. Creative thinking is an activity that processes received information to produce new representations and innovative ideas. Developing this skill is essential for students; however, recent research has yet to classify their creative thinking in solving non-routine problems. This study created a new classification based on three aspects of creative thinking in solving mathematical problems. The research used a qualitative descriptive approach, employing 72 students from Indonesia as subjects in a test involving the use of the think-aloud approach in problem-solving. Data collection consisted of tests, observations, and interviews. There were three stages of data analysis: data reduction, presentation and conclusions, and verification. This study’s results grouped students’ creative thinking processes in solving non-routine problems into three classifications: direct, flexible, and elaborative. The three classifications differ in the strategies or steps used to solve problems. The similarities of the three classifications include using similar aspects of creative thinking, namely flexibility, fluency, and elaboration in solving non-routine problems, even though some of these aspects have yet to be realised optimally due to students’ creative thinking in solving mathematical problems, especially non-routine problems, still needing improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2394738
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems

Naufal Ishartono, Fredi Ganda Putra, Boris Forthmann, Muhammad Noor Kholid et al.
16 citations
Cogent Education
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
15.60
article

Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems

Naufal Ishartono, Fredi Ganda Putra, Boris Forthmann, Muhammad Noor Kholid, Menik Mahmudah
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Creative thinking transforms existing information, either from long-term memory or external sources, into new representations and innovative ideas. Creative thinking is an activity that processes received information to produce new representations and innovative ideas. Developing this skill is essential for students; however, recent research has yet to classify their creative thinking in solving non-routine problems. This study created a new classification based on three aspects of creative thinking in solving mathematical problems. The research used a qualitative descriptive approach, employing 72 students from Indonesia as subjects in a test involving the use of the think-aloud approach in problem-solving. Data collection consisted of tests, observations, and interviews. There were three stages of data analysis: data reduction, presentation and conclusions, and verification. This study’s results grouped students’ creative thinking processes in solving non-routine problems into three classifications: direct, flexible, and elaborative. The three classifications differ in the strategies or steps used to solve problems. The similarities of the three classifications include using similar aspects of creative thinking, namely flexibility, fluency, and elaboration in solving non-routine problems, even though some of these aspects have yet to be realised optimally due to students’ creative thinking in solving mathematical problems, especially non-routine problems, still needing improvement.

Cogent EducationVol. 11(1)
University of Münster (DE), Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID), Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
15.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.