Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading

Emission trading schemes (ETS) are increasingly becoming a popular policy instrument to balance carbon abatement and economic growth. As a globally unified carbon pricing system has not yet been established, whether regionally operated ETSs cause carbon leakage remains a major concern. Taking China's regional pilot ETSs as a quasi-natural experiment, the study uses the spatial difference-in-differences method to examine how regional ETSs affect carbon emissions in and outside cities of policy implementation. Our analysis finds that China's regional ETS policy contributes to a 6.1% reduction in urban CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and a 6.6% decline in emissions intensity in regulated cities, causing carbon leakages that increase CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in neighboring cities by 1.7% on average. Our finding further suggests that regional ETSs mitigate local CO<sub>2</sub> emissions through outsourcing production, improving energy efficiency and decarbonizing energy structure, whereas the outsourcing of industrial production drives up CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in adjacent cities. Moreover, the performances of regional ETSs vary largely by socioeconomic context and mechanism design. China's regional ETSs reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions more effectively in central and industrial cities but with more severe carbon leakage, while rigorous compliance mechanisms and active market trading help deepen carbon abatement and alleviate carbon leakage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04738
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading

Shuai Shao, Kuishuang Feng, Zhenzhong Zeng, Xiujie Tan et al.
14 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.81
article

Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading

Shuai Shao, Kuishuang Feng, Zhenzhong Zeng, Xiujie Tan, Zhuoluo Sun, Bin Ye, Jingjing Jiang, Xin Yang
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Emission trading schemes (ETS) are increasingly becoming a popular policy instrument to balance carbon abatement and economic growth. As a globally unified carbon pricing system has not yet been established, whether regionally operated ETSs cause carbon leakage remains a major concern. Taking China's regional pilot ETSs as a quasi-natural experiment, the study uses the spatial difference-in-differences method to examine how regional ETSs affect carbon emissions in and outside cities of policy implementation. Our analysis finds that China's regional ETS policy contributes to a 6.1% reduction in urban CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and a 6.6% decline in emissions intensity in regulated cities, causing carbon leakages that increase CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in neighboring cities by 1.7% on average. Our finding further suggests that regional ETSs mitigate local CO<sub>2</sub> emissions through outsourcing production, improving energy efficiency and decarbonizing energy structure, whereas the outsourcing of industrial production drives up CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in adjacent cities. Moreover, the performances of regional ETSs vary largely by socioeconomic context and mechanism design. China's regional ETSs reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions more effectively in central and industrial cities but with more severe carbon leakage, while rigorous compliance mechanisms and active market trading help deepen carbon abatement and alleviate carbon leakage.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 58(40)
East China University of Science and Technology (CN), Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology (CN), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Wuhan University (CN), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Social Science Fund of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.