Validation of a German Version of the Collision Anxiety Questionnaire

The main quality of virtual reality (VR) is its high immersive potential. However, the resulting inability to perceive the real world surroundings can distract users from the application due to the fear of colliding with obstacles or other people. The Collision Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) by Ring et al. measures this fear of colliding and consists of ten items in three subscales: general collision anxiety, orientation, and interpersonal collision anxiety. In this paper, we present a validated German version of the CAQ, which showed a good model fit, including good reliability and internal and discriminant validity. By validating the questionnaire, we offer researchers a tool to further explore and evaluate the concept of collision anxiety, helping to uncover previously under-explored aspects of the user experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3670653.3677516
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a German Version of the Collision Anxiety Questionnaire

Patrizia Ring, Maic Masuch, Julius Tietenberg
3 citations
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.23
article

Validation of a German Version of the Collision Anxiety Questionnaire

Patrizia Ring, Maic Masuch, Julius Tietenberg
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The main quality of virtual reality (VR) is its high immersive potential. However, the resulting inability to perceive the real world surroundings can distract users from the application due to the fear of colliding with obstacles or other people. The Collision Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) by Ring et al. measures this fear of colliding and consists of ten items in three subscales: general collision anxiety, orientation, and interpersonal collision anxiety. In this paper, we present a validated German version of the CAQ, which showed a good model fit, including good reliability and internal and discriminant validity. By validating the questionnaire, we offer researchers a tool to further explore and evaluate the concept of collision anxiety, helping to uncover previously under-explored aspects of the user experience.

University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.