Sorting with Teams

We fully solve a sorting problem with heterogeneous firms and multiple heterogeneous workers whose skills are imperfect substitutes. We show that optimal sorting, which we call mixed and countermonotonic, is comprised of two regions. In the first region, mediocre firms sort with mediocre workers and coworkers such that the output losses are equal across all these teams (mixing). In the second region, a high-skill worker sorts with low-skill coworkers and a high-productivity firm (countermonotonicity). We characterize the equilibrium wages and firm values. Quantitatively, our model can generate the dispersion of earnings within and across US firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732891
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sorting with Teams

Alexander P. Zimin, Aleh Tsyvinski, Job Boerma
5 citations
Journal of Political Economy
Game Theory and Voting Systems
5.65
article

Sorting with Teams

Alexander P. Zimin, Aleh Tsyvinski, Job Boerma
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We fully solve a sorting problem with heterogeneous firms and multiple heterogeneous workers whose skills are imperfect substitutes. We show that optimal sorting, which we call mixed and countermonotonic, is comprised of two regions. In the first region, mediocre firms sort with mediocre workers and coworkers such that the output losses are equal across all these teams (mixing). In the second region, a high-skill worker sorts with low-skill coworkers and a high-productivity firm (countermonotonicity). We characterize the equilibrium wages and firm values. Quantitatively, our model can generate the dispersion of earnings within and across US firms.

Journal of Political EconomyVol. 133(2)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Yale University (US), Higher Institute of Engineering (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.