Targeting Precision Medicine: Evidence from Prenatal Screening

We study the introduction of a noninvasive prenatal screening—cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening—which is used to target a more costly invasive test that elevates miscarriage risk. Using Swedish administrative data, we document that coverage of cfDNA substantially increases cfDNA screening and reduces invasive testing. We develop and estimate a stylized model of prenatal choices and find that narrow targeting of cfDNA coverage can improve outcomes and reduce costs, while broader coverage also improves outcomes but with increased costs. These findings point to the potential gains from well-designed targeting of screening but at the same time highlight the importance of the targeting design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732893
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Targeting Precision Medicine: Evidence from Prenatal Screening

Amy Finkelstein, Peter Conner, Liran Einav, Petra Persson
1 citations
Journal of Political Economy
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
1.11
article

Targeting Precision Medicine: Evidence from Prenatal Screening

Amy Finkelstein, Peter Conner, Liran Einav, Petra Persson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We study the introduction of a noninvasive prenatal screening—cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening—which is used to target a more costly invasive test that elevates miscarriage risk. Using Swedish administrative data, we document that coverage of cfDNA substantially increases cfDNA screening and reduces invasive testing. We develop and estimate a stylized model of prenatal choices and find that narrow targeting of cfDNA coverage can improve outcomes and reduce costs, while broader coverage also improves outcomes but with increased costs. These findings point to the potential gains from well-designed targeting of screening but at the same time highlight the importance of the targeting design.

Journal of Political EconomyVol. 133(2)
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Research Institute of Industrial Economics (SE), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Targeting Precision Medicine: Evidence from Prenatal Screening — Amy Finkelstein, Peter Conner, et al. · Journal of Political Economy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS