Some Surviving, Others Thriving: Inequality in Loss and Coping During the Pandemic

We investigate the contrasting realities of the pandemic on psychosocial experiences and ways of coping among American Voices Project respondent surveys (<i>N</i> = 720) and interviews (<i>N</i> = 172). Despite similar levels of distress early in the pandemic, by late 2020 clear differences across education, race and ethnicity, and gender emerged, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Those with structural advantages reported greater gains from the pandemic, including self-improvement opportunities like therapy and time outdoors. In contrast, respondents without college degrees, Black and Hispanic individuals, and women reported experiencing greater psychosocial shocks into the later months of 2020 and feeling disproportionately undervalued, socially disconnected, and stressed, respectively. The former two groups also systematically differed in their coping strategies, which included hard work, emotion suppression, and faith.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2024.10.4.03
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Some Surviving, Others Thriving: Inequality in Loss and Coping During the Pandemic

Macario Alemany García, Catherine Thomas, Hazel Rose Markus, Michael C. Schwalbe et al.
6 citations
RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Employment and Welfare Studies
5.10
article

Some Surviving, Others Thriving: Inequality in Loss and Coping During the Pandemic

Macario Alemany García, Catherine Thomas, Hazel Rose Markus, Michael C. Schwalbe, Geoffrey L. Cohen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We investigate the contrasting realities of the pandemic on psychosocial experiences and ways of coping among American Voices Project respondent surveys (<i>N</i> = 720) and interviews (<i>N</i> = 172). Despite similar levels of distress early in the pandemic, by late 2020 clear differences across education, race and ethnicity, and gender emerged, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Those with structural advantages reported greater gains from the pandemic, including self-improvement opportunities like therapy and time outdoors. In contrast, respondents without college degrees, Black and Hispanic individuals, and women reported experiencing greater psychosocial shocks into the later months of 2020 and feeling disproportionately undervalued, socially disconnected, and stressed, respectively. The former two groups also systematically differed in their coping strategies, which included hard work, emotion suppression, and faith.

RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social SciencesVol. 10(4)
Innovations for Poverty Action (US), Kennesaw State University (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US), Stanford University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Employment and Welfare Studies
5.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.