Intersectional Burdens: How Social Location Shapes Interactions with the Administrative State

Administrative decisions mediate whether the millions who turn to the state for social services annually can access the assistance they need. We introduce the concept of <i>intersectional burdens</i>—which describes how a person’s social location (including race, class, gender, age, and ability) shapes their access and use of state benefits and programs—to account for the ways mutually reinforcing systems structure experiences with the state and to better understand how inequalities are experienced, reproduced, and resisted. We illustrate the intersectional nature of associated costs by drawing on a random stratified sample of sixty-one Black, Latinx, and White women’s experiences from the American Voices Project. We find that individuals who seek public safety net assistance do not experience administrative burdens in the same way or to the same degree and that social location substantively affects how people navigate administrative burdens in public income assistance processes, health-care systems, and housing experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2024.10.4.04
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional Burdens: How Social Location Shapes Interactions with the Administrative State

Theresa Rocha Beardall, Tony Cheng, Collin Mueller
12 citations
RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Regulation and Compliance Studies
6.66
article

Intersectional Burdens: How Social Location Shapes Interactions with the Administrative State

Theresa Rocha Beardall, Tony Cheng, Collin Mueller
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Administrative decisions mediate whether the millions who turn to the state for social services annually can access the assistance they need. We introduce the concept of <i>intersectional burdens</i>—which describes how a person’s social location (including race, class, gender, age, and ability) shapes their access and use of state benefits and programs—to account for the ways mutually reinforcing systems structure experiences with the state and to better understand how inequalities are experienced, reproduced, and resisted. We illustrate the intersectional nature of associated costs by drawing on a random stratified sample of sixty-one Black, Latinx, and White women’s experiences from the American Voices Project. We find that individuals who seek public safety net assistance do not experience administrative burdens in the same way or to the same degree and that social location substantively affects how people navigate administrative burdens in public income assistance processes, health-care systems, and housing experiences.

RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social SciencesVol. 10(4)
Duke University (US), University of Washington (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
6.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intersectional Burdens: How Social Location Shapes Interactions with the Administrative State — Theresa Rocha Beardall, Tony Cheng, et al. · RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS