Unpacking Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation using simulations and relating current flow to reported motions: Comparison across common and specialized electrode placements
We expect our study to advance understanding of GVS and provide insight on probable mechanism of action of a certain electrode placement choice. The dataset generated across several metrics will support hypothesis testing relating empirical outcomes to current flow patterns. Further, the differences in current flow will guide stimulation strategy (what placement and how much scalp current to use) and facilitate a quantitatively informed rational / optimal decision.
Authors
- Chris Thomas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8397-5107)
- Abhishek Datta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-8125)
- Dennis Q. Truong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2906-3892)
- Torin K. Clark (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9345-9712)
- Yishai Valter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6131-1166)
- Sanjidah Ira
Institutions
- City College of New York (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Soterix Medical (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2024-08-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309007
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.24
Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission