Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: case series

Introduction The differential diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging in patients with systemic diseases due to identical clinical and laboratory patterns and activity of the inflammatory process. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic data and results of debridement of PJI in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a case series. Material and methods A retrospective analysis of surgical treatment of PJI was produced in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between 2014 and 2022. PJI was verified based on ICM criteria. A poor outcome included the presence of clinical and laboratory signs of infection on admission to the second stage of treatment and recurrence after successful debridement. Results Among the 524 cases of PJI, 35 (6.7 %) were patients with rheumatoid arthritis with 48.6 % receiving antibiotics prior to admission. Culture-negative infection was recorded in 38.4 %. PJI was not confirmed in five cases (14.3 %). High average values of inflammatory markers were registered in the blood (ESR, CRP and D-dimer) before and after debridement; decreased ESR and leukocyte count in the synovial fluid was statistically significant. Favorable outcomes were obtained in 82.9 % of cases at mid term with every fifth patient treated with a spacer or arthrodesis. Discussion The incidence of culture-negative infection in patients with systemic diseases was reported as much as 27–37 %. A systematic review of the literature showed that the percentage of band neutrophils in synovial fluid has a sensitivity of 95.2 % and a specificity of 85.0 %, with an optimal threshold of 78 % sufficient to verify infection. The poor outcomes we identified resulted from two- or three-stage surgical treatment. Other authors reported better outcomes with two-stage debridement. Conclusion Culture-negative infection was common in cases of PJI observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Favorable outcomes were seen mostly with two-stage surgical treatment. Inflammatory markers ESR, CRP and D-dimer did not reach normal values during diagnosis and treatment of infection indicating the inapplicability of standard diagnostic criteria for PJI in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Genij Ortopedii
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-4-552-560
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: case series

Н. Н. Пчелова, Н. С. Николаев, E. V. Preobrazhenskaya, E. A. Lyubimov et al.
1 citations
Genij Ortopedii
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
0.57
article

Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: case series

Н. Н. Пчелова, Н. С. Николаев, E. V. Preobrazhenskaya, E. A. Lyubimov, L. V. Lyubimova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction The differential diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging in patients with systemic diseases due to identical clinical and laboratory patterns and activity of the inflammatory process. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic data and results of debridement of PJI in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a case series. Material and methods A retrospective analysis of surgical treatment of PJI was produced in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between 2014 and 2022. PJI was verified based on ICM criteria. A poor outcome included the presence of clinical and laboratory signs of infection on admission to the second stage of treatment and recurrence after successful debridement. Results Among the 524 cases of PJI, 35 (6.7 %) were patients with rheumatoid arthritis with 48.6 % receiving antibiotics prior to admission. Culture-negative infection was recorded in 38.4 %. PJI was not confirmed in five cases (14.3 %). High average values of inflammatory markers were registered in the blood (ESR, CRP and D-dimer) before and after debridement; decreased ESR and leukocyte count in the synovial fluid was statistically significant. Favorable outcomes were obtained in 82.9 % of cases at mid term with every fifth patient treated with a spacer or arthrodesis. Discussion The incidence of culture-negative infection in patients with systemic diseases was reported as much as 27–37 %. A systematic review of the literature showed that the percentage of band neutrophils in synovial fluid has a sensitivity of 95.2 % and a specificity of 85.0 %, with an optimal threshold of 78 % sufficient to verify infection. The poor outcomes we identified resulted from two- or three-stage surgical treatment. Other authors reported better outcomes with two-stage debridement. Conclusion Culture-negative infection was common in cases of PJI observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Favorable outcomes were seen mostly with two-stage surgical treatment. Inflammatory markers ESR, CRP and D-dimer did not reach normal values during diagnosis and treatment of infection indicating the inapplicability of standard diagnostic criteria for PJI in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Genij OrtopediiVol. 30(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.