Evidence for separate backward recall and <i>n</i> -back working memory factors: a large-scale latent variable analysis

Multiple studies have explored the factor structure of working memory (WM) tasks, yet few have done so controlling for both the domain and category of the memory items in a single study. In the current pre-registered study, we conducted a large-scale latent variable analysis using variant forms of n-back and backward recall tasks to test whether they measured a single underlying construct, or were distinguished by stimuli-, domain-, or paradigm-specific factors. Exploratory analyses investigated how the resulting WM factor(s) were linked to fluid intelligence. Participants (<i>N</i> = 703) completed a fluid reasoning test and multiple n-back and backward recall tasks containing memoranda that varied across (spatial or verbal material) and within (verbal digits or letters) domain, allowing the variance specific to task content and paradigm to be assessed. Two distinct but related backward recall and n-back constructs best captured the data, in comparison to other plausible model constructions (single WM factor, two-factor domain, and three-factor materials models). Common variance associated with WM was a stronger predictor of fluid reasoning than a residual n-back factor, but the backward recall factor predicted fluid reasoning as strongly as the common WM factor. These data emphasise the distinctiveness between backward recall and n-back tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2393388
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence for separate backward recall and n -back working memory factors: a large-scale latent variable analysis

Elizabeth M. Byrne, Joni Holmes, Rebecca A. Gilbert, Rogier Kievit
4 citations
Memory
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
1.52
article

Evidence for separate backward recall and n -back working memory factors: a large-scale latent variable analysis

Elizabeth M. Byrne, Joni Holmes, Rebecca A. Gilbert, Rogier Kievit
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Multiple studies have explored the factor structure of working memory (WM) tasks, yet few have done so controlling for both the domain and category of the memory items in a single study. In the current pre-registered study, we conducted a large-scale latent variable analysis using variant forms of n-back and backward recall tasks to test whether they measured a single underlying construct, or were distinguished by stimuli-, domain-, or paradigm-specific factors. Exploratory analyses investigated how the resulting WM factor(s) were linked to fluid intelligence. Participants (<i>N</i> = 703) completed a fluid reasoning test and multiple n-back and backward recall tasks containing memoranda that varied across (spatial or verbal material) and within (verbal digits or letters) domain, allowing the variance specific to task content and paradigm to be assessed. Two distinct but related backward recall and n-back constructs best captured the data, in comparison to other plausible model constructions (single WM factor, two-factor domain, and three-factor materials models). Common variance associated with WM was a stronger predictor of fluid reasoning than a residual n-back factor, but the backward recall factor predicted fluid reasoning as strongly as the common WM factor. These data emphasise the distinctiveness between backward recall and n-back tasks.

MemoryVol. 32(9)
University of East Anglia (GB), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Institute of Cognitive and Brain Sciences (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
University of Cambridge, Medical Research Council Canada, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.