Ensemble machine learning models for predicting the CO2 footprint of GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete

While geopolymer concrete (GPC) has gained popularity for its environmentally friendly attributes compared to ordinary Portland cement, the absence of a prediction model for the carbon footprint of its constituents presents challenges for optimization within the evolving concrete industry. This study offers a thorough CO 2 footprint prediction for ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS)-based GPC, utilizing advanced AI techniques, including a combination of machine learning models and stacking ensembles. This research statistically examines crucial parameters responsible for CO 2 emissions in GGBFS-based GPC production, identifying factors like superplasticizer content, initial curing temperature, and NaOH (dry) content as significant contributors. Emphasizing sustainability, the study advocates optimizing concrete mixtures by considering factors like the NaOH ratio to other activator materials. After rigorously evaluating 12 machine learning models, including ensemble techniques, this study identified M4—a stacking model of Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Neural Network (NN)—as weak models, and Decision Tree (DT) as a meta-model, as the most effective ensemble model for predicting CO 2 footprints. The choice of M4 is supported by various performance metrics such as the lowest Mean Squared Error of 88.8 and Root Mean Squared Error of 9.42, alongside the highest R 2 , Adjusted R 2 , and Explained Variance scores, all approximately 0.95. Additional analyses, such as Euclidean distance and Taylor diagrams, further substantiate the selection of M4. The findings have practical implications for sustainable and cleaner concrete production, enabling businesses to optimize the CO 2 footprint of GGBFS-based GPC. • Carbon footprint of the GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete is studied. • Superplasticizer, curing temperature, and dry NaOH content impact CO 2 footprint. • Prediction models for CO 2 footprint of GGBFS-based GPC developed with ML algorithms. • One stacking ensemble model (M4) developed for precise CO 2 footprint prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143463
Citations
55
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensemble machine learning models for predicting the CO2 footprint of GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete

Imrose B. Muhit, Ebrahim Al-wajih, Amin Al‐Fakih, Radhwan A. A. Saleh
55 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
14.35
article

Ensemble machine learning models for predicting the CO2 footprint of GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete

Imrose B. Muhit, Ebrahim Al-wajih, Amin Al‐Fakih, Radhwan A. A. Saleh
article en
55 citations

Abstract

While geopolymer concrete (GPC) has gained popularity for its environmentally friendly attributes compared to ordinary Portland cement, the absence of a prediction model for the carbon footprint of its constituents presents challenges for optimization within the evolving concrete industry. This study offers a thorough CO 2 footprint prediction for ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS)-based GPC, utilizing advanced AI techniques, including a combination of machine learning models and stacking ensembles. This research statistically examines crucial parameters responsible for CO 2 emissions in GGBFS-based GPC production, identifying factors like superplasticizer content, initial curing temperature, and NaOH (dry) content as significant contributors. Emphasizing sustainability, the study advocates optimizing concrete mixtures by considering factors like the NaOH ratio to other activator materials. After rigorously evaluating 12 machine learning models, including ensemble techniques, this study identified M4—a stacking model of Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Neural Network (NN)—as weak models, and Decision Tree (DT) as a meta-model, as the most effective ensemble model for predicting CO 2 footprints. The choice of M4 is supported by various performance metrics such as the lowest Mean Squared Error of 88.8 and Root Mean Squared Error of 9.42, alongside the highest R 2 , Adjusted R 2 , and Explained Variance scores, all approximately 0.95. Additional analyses, such as Euclidean distance and Taylor diagrams, further substantiate the selection of M4. The findings have practical implications for sustainable and cleaner concrete production, enabling businesses to optimize the CO 2 footprint of GGBFS-based GPC. • Carbon footprint of the GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete is studied. • Superplasticizer, curing temperature, and dry NaOH content impact CO 2 footprint. • Prediction models for CO 2 footprint of GGBFS-based GPC developed with ML algorithms. • One stacking ensemble model (M4) developed for precise CO 2 footprint prediction.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 472
Universidade da Coruña (ES), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (ES), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Teesside University (GB)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
14.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.