COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL DESIGN AND FLOW ANALYSIS OF QUADRUPED ROBOTS

In recent years, there has been a trend of developing innovative technologies inspired by living creatures in nature. Quadruped robots, in particular, have emerged as walking mobile systems with articulated leg structures that can skilfully perform dynamic movements that wheeled systems are limited to. These robots offer advantages in technical criteria such as manoeuvrability, cross-capability, controllability, terrain adaptability and stability. It is important to note that this evaluation is based on objective technical criteria rather than subjective opinions. This study compares the advantages and disadvantages of quadruped robots to wheeled systems. It highlights that quadruped robots outperform wheeled systems in manoeuvrability, obstacle overcoming, and speed, particularly in rough terrains. The study also suggests that designers of quadruped robots should consider aerodynamic factors, which are often overlooked. Flow analysis using the finite element method is crucial in robot design to enhance aerodynamic performance. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse the flow structure around quadruped robots using Computational Fluid Dynamics and investigate passive flow control methods to reduce the drag coefficient (Cd). The study examines four different robots, and the resulting Cd average percentage calculations are presented. The aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 4 compared to Robot 2 was found to be 95%. Similarly, the aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 3 was determined to be 28% compared to Robot 2. Additionally, it was determined that the aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 2 was 76% compared to Robot 1. These results provide an important comparison to understand the energy efficiency, differences in aerodynamic performance and relative effectiveness of quadruped robots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1437626
Primary Topic
Robotic Locomotion and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL DESIGN AND FLOW ANALYSIS OF QUADRUPED ROBOTS

Cengiz Tepe, Enes Uzun
International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry
Robotic Locomotion and Control
article

COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL DESIGN AND FLOW ANALYSIS OF QUADRUPED ROBOTS

Cengiz Tepe, Enes Uzun
article en

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a trend of developing innovative technologies inspired by living creatures in nature. Quadruped robots, in particular, have emerged as walking mobile systems with articulated leg structures that can skilfully perform dynamic movements that wheeled systems are limited to. These robots offer advantages in technical criteria such as manoeuvrability, cross-capability, controllability, terrain adaptability and stability. It is important to note that this evaluation is based on objective technical criteria rather than subjective opinions. This study compares the advantages and disadvantages of quadruped robots to wheeled systems. It highlights that quadruped robots outperform wheeled systems in manoeuvrability, obstacle overcoming, and speed, particularly in rough terrains. The study also suggests that designers of quadruped robots should consider aerodynamic factors, which are often overlooked. Flow analysis using the finite element method is crucial in robot design to enhance aerodynamic performance. This paper aims to comprehensively analyse the flow structure around quadruped robots using Computational Fluid Dynamics and investigate passive flow control methods to reduce the drag coefficient (Cd). The study examines four different robots, and the resulting Cd average percentage calculations are presented. The aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 4 compared to Robot 2 was found to be 95%. Similarly, the aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 3 was determined to be 28% compared to Robot 2. Additionally, it was determined that the aerodynamic efficiency of Robot 2 was 76% compared to Robot 1. These results provide an important comparison to understand the energy efficiency, differences in aerodynamic performance and relative effectiveness of quadruped robots.

International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital IndustryVol. 8(2)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Robotic Locomotion and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL DESIGN AND FLOW ANALYSIS OF QUADRUPED ROBOTS — Cengiz Tepe, Enes Uzun · International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS