Re-conceptualizing climate maladaptation: Complementing social-ecological interactions with relational socionatures

• Climate maladaptation is often studied using an “interactional ontology.” • “Relational ontologies” deepen the nature, causes, and redressal of maladaptation. • Maladaptation is constituted through dynamic material and discursive relations. • A case from Maharashtra, India demonstrates the necessity of relational approaches. Cases of climate maladaptation are increasingly documented. Its identification and redressal has become a priority for researchers and policymakers concerned with climate vulnerability reduction. The ability to address climate maladaptation hinges on being open to its diverse causes, manifestations, and impacts. This study argues that climate maladaptation analyses are dominated by an “interactional ontology”—the understanding that it can be explained as an observable outcome from how separate social, economic, and political systems interact in moments of time. Consequently, efforts to curb climate maladaptation often target the institutional contexts (e.g., rules, regulations) understood as enabling adaptation practices to aggravate climate risks. But this only captures a partial aspect of climate maladaptation, neglecting underlying causes and processes. We argue a “relational ontology” can complement the “why and how” of maladaptation. A relational ontology understands climate maladaptation as an evolving process constituted through dynamic material and discursive relations, versus an observable outcome from separately interacting systems. By analyzing how adaptation initiatives are related to, framed, and politicized, assembly processes are rendered visible. To demonstrate this, we study the Government of Maharashtra’s (India) Jalyukt Shivar Abhiyan , a program aimed at increasing water conservation to “free” 20,000 villages from drought impacts. From our theorization and empirical case, we discuss how a relational ontology contributes to debates in the climate maladaptation literature and invites approaches for mitigating this phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Change
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102910
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-conceptualizing climate maladaptation: Complementing social-ecological interactions with relational socionatures

Idowu Mopelola Ajibade, K. J. Joy, Sameer H. Shah, Leila M. Harris et al.
3 citations
Global Environmental Change
Climate Change Communication and Perception
3.40
article

Re-conceptualizing climate maladaptation: Complementing social-ecological interactions with relational socionatures

Idowu Mopelola Ajibade, K. J. Joy, Sameer H. Shah, Leila M. Harris, Trevor Birkenholtz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Climate maladaptation is often studied using an “interactional ontology.” • “Relational ontologies” deepen the nature, causes, and redressal of maladaptation. • Maladaptation is constituted through dynamic material and discursive relations. • A case from Maharashtra, India demonstrates the necessity of relational approaches. Cases of climate maladaptation are increasingly documented. Its identification and redressal has become a priority for researchers and policymakers concerned with climate vulnerability reduction. The ability to address climate maladaptation hinges on being open to its diverse causes, manifestations, and impacts. This study argues that climate maladaptation analyses are dominated by an “interactional ontology”—the understanding that it can be explained as an observable outcome from how separate social, economic, and political systems interact in moments of time. Consequently, efforts to curb climate maladaptation often target the institutional contexts (e.g., rules, regulations) understood as enabling adaptation practices to aggravate climate risks. But this only captures a partial aspect of climate maladaptation, neglecting underlying causes and processes. We argue a “relational ontology” can complement the “why and how” of maladaptation. A relational ontology understands climate maladaptation as an evolving process constituted through dynamic material and discursive relations, versus an observable outcome from separately interacting systems. By analyzing how adaptation initiatives are related to, framed, and politicized, assembly processes are rendered visible. To demonstrate this, we study the Government of Maharashtra’s (India) Jalyukt Shivar Abhiyan , a program aimed at increasing water conservation to “free” 20,000 villages from drought impacts. From our theorization and empirical case, we discuss how a relational ontology contributes to debates in the climate maladaptation literature and invites approaches for mitigating this phenomenon.

Global Environmental ChangeVol. 88
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Emory University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Gender Studies (CZ), Society for Promoting Participative Ecosystem Management (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.