Metal additive manufacturing adoption in SMEs: Technical attributes, challenges, and opportunities

Recent advancements in Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) are transforming manufacturing. Most research and market adoption of MAM have focused on Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), with less attention given to Directed Energy Deposition (DED), Binder Jetting (BJ), and Metal Material Extrusion (MEX), which are only now reaching industrial readiness. This increased availability of MAM processes provides SMEs with a wider range of options, opening up new opportunities that were previously inaccessible. However, despite recent technological improvements that broaden potential applications, the suitability of these processes for industrial use by SMEs is not yet well understood. SMEs currently face difficulties in adopting MAM due to complexities and costs. Moreover, existing literature often overlooks the distinct characteristics and needs of SMEs, making it challenging for them to identify the most suitable MAM processes. This study addresses this gap by using a fuzzy logic approach to evaluate the technical characteristics of PBF, DED, BJ, and MEX, focusing on their compatibility with SME requirements. Each process is ranked based on criteria including costs, complexity, energy consumption, mechanical quality, geometrical quality, speed, and market demand. This evaluation is refined through logarithmic normalization and scaling, resulting in a comprehensive scoring system from 1 to 5. Based on these findings, an SME-focused evaluation matrix is proposed to guide SMEs in selecting the most appropriate MAM process for their specific contexts. This matrix promotes informed and effective adoption strategies, supported by practical examples illustrating the application of each MAM process in SME environments. • Technical comparison of four prominent MAM processes: PBF, MEX, BJ, and DED. • Assesses each MAM process compatibility with SMEs operational framework. • Comparative summary of each MAM process strengths and weakness. • Strategic insights for MAM adoption in SMEs with a decision-making evaluation matrix.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.074
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metal additive manufacturing adoption in SMEs: Technical attributes, challenges, and opportunities

Wei Deng Solvang, Mathias Sæterbø
20 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.07
article

Metal additive manufacturing adoption in SMEs: Technical attributes, challenges, and opportunities

Wei Deng Solvang, Mathias Sæterbø
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Recent advancements in Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) are transforming manufacturing. Most research and market adoption of MAM have focused on Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), with less attention given to Directed Energy Deposition (DED), Binder Jetting (BJ), and Metal Material Extrusion (MEX), which are only now reaching industrial readiness. This increased availability of MAM processes provides SMEs with a wider range of options, opening up new opportunities that were previously inaccessible. However, despite recent technological improvements that broaden potential applications, the suitability of these processes for industrial use by SMEs is not yet well understood. SMEs currently face difficulties in adopting MAM due to complexities and costs. Moreover, existing literature often overlooks the distinct characteristics and needs of SMEs, making it challenging for them to identify the most suitable MAM processes. This study addresses this gap by using a fuzzy logic approach to evaluate the technical characteristics of PBF, DED, BJ, and MEX, focusing on their compatibility with SME requirements. Each process is ranked based on criteria including costs, complexity, energy consumption, mechanical quality, geometrical quality, speed, and market demand. This evaluation is refined through logarithmic normalization and scaling, resulting in a comprehensive scoring system from 1 to 5. Based on these findings, an SME-focused evaluation matrix is proposed to guide SMEs in selecting the most appropriate MAM process for their specific contexts. This matrix promotes informed and effective adoption strategies, supported by practical examples illustrating the application of each MAM process in SME environments. • Technical comparison of four prominent MAM processes: PBF, MEX, BJ, and DED. • Assesses each MAM process compatibility with SMEs operational framework. • Comparative summary of each MAM process strengths and weakness. • Strategic insights for MAM adoption in SMEs with a decision-making evaluation matrix.

Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesVol. 128
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.