Comparing generative artificial intelligence tools to voice assistants using reference interactions

This study investigates the ability of voice assistants and generative AI tools to respond to reference questions traditionally received by academic librarians. The authors created a sample of 25 questions based on queries received on the virtual reference service at their institution. They then created a rubric to evaluate the quality of the answers that the AI powered tools provided. The authors determined that the tools understand reference questions well and provide relevant answers but that the quality of the references provided, and the accuracy of the answers can be lacking. They suggest that more research needs to be done to understand the place of AI powered tools in reference services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102942
Citations
13
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing generative artificial intelligence tools to voice assistants using reference interactions

Sandy Hervieux, Amanda Wheatley
13 citations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
AI in Service Interactions
4.52
article

Comparing generative artificial intelligence tools to voice assistants using reference interactions

Sandy Hervieux, Amanda Wheatley
article en
13 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the ability of voice assistants and generative AI tools to respond to reference questions traditionally received by academic librarians. The authors created a sample of 25 questions based on queries received on the virtual reference service at their institution. They then created a rubric to evaluate the quality of the answers that the AI powered tools provided. The authors determined that the tools understand reference questions well and provide relevant answers but that the quality of the references provided, and the accuracy of the answers can be lacking. They suggest that more research needs to be done to understand the place of AI powered tools in reference services.

The Journal of Academic LibrarianshipVol. 50(5)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in Service Interactions
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing generative artificial intelligence tools to voice assistants using reference interactions — Sandy Hervieux, Amanda Wheatley · The Journal of Academic Librarianship (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS