Large language models (LLMs): Risks and policy implications

Although statistical language modeling has been a fairly active area of academic research in artificial intelligence (AI) since the 1980s, the recent explosion of both technological innovation and public attention around LLMs has dramatically changed the space of applications for this work. The unprecedented scale of these new models carries with it emergent capabilities—particularly in the form of generative models—that have made the technology generalizable to a broad range of use cases and accessible to the general public. Yet these rapidly developing features also pose novel risks, ranging from environmental impacts and copyright violations to misinformation and hate speech. Traditional regulatory frameworks are not well-equipped to match either the rapid pace of innovation or the ability of LLMs to transcend the jurisdictions of individual governing bodies. Thus far, the governance gap has been filled by soft law frameworks such as private company standards, voluntary codes of conduct, and design guides from non-regulatory standard-setting organizations. Still, there is rising demand to solidify these soft guidelines into hard law. In addition to offering a historical overview of LLMs and highlighting some of the most pressing concerns involving LLMs today, we discuss legislative attempts to address these concerns and outline potential complicating factors.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38105/spr.3qrco9kp8x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large language models (LLMs): Risks and policy implications

Alison Fang, Jana Perkins
4 citations
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
1.39
article

Large language models (LLMs): Risks and policy implications

Alison Fang, Jana Perkins
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Although statistical language modeling has been a fairly active area of academic research in artificial intelligence (AI) since the 1980s, the recent explosion of both technological innovation and public attention around LLMs has dramatically changed the space of applications for this work. The unprecedented scale of these new models carries with it emergent capabilities—particularly in the form of generative models—that have made the technology generalizable to a broad range of use cases and accessible to the general public. Yet these rapidly developing features also pose novel risks, ranging from environmental impacts and copyright violations to misinformation and hate speech. Traditional regulatory frameworks are not well-equipped to match either the rapid pace of innovation or the ability of LLMs to transcend the jurisdictions of individual governing bodies. Thus far, the governance gap has been filled by soft law frameworks such as private company standards, voluntary codes of conduct, and design guides from non-regulatory standard-setting organizations. Still, there is rising demand to solidify these soft guidelines into hard law. In addition to offering a historical overview of LLMs and highlighting some of the most pressing concerns involving LLMs today, we discuss legislative attempts to address these concerns and outline potential complicating factors.

Vol. 5
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.