Evaluation of a standard analytical model and definition of efficiency metrics for lunar and planetary excavation

To sustainably live on and explore the lunar and other planetary surfaces, in situ regolith will need to be used for resource extraction and infrastructure development. To evaluate and ensure such safety and efficiency of excavation operations in variable, site-specific regolith terranes with given equipment designs, reliable computational models are necessary. The work here evaluates the accuracy and reliability of a standard, well-established excavation force prediction model using published data from a previous planetary excavation experimental study and establishes efficiency metrics for force reduced excavation as a proof-of-concept. It is shown that the established excavation force prediction model is not able to simulate planetary excavation mechanics sufficiently and hence more advanced models of lunar and planetary excavation are needed to enable safer, faster, and more economical resource acquisition hardware development. The case study of the efficiency metrics being applied to the published data shows informative trends that can be used in future excavation hardware and tool path optimizations. These are recommended for use in future planetary excavation modeling and planning workflows. • Current models of excavation mechanics are not sufficient for lunar and planetary excavation analyses. • Extraterrestrial regolith excavation modeling requires reliability not given by current state-of-the-art models. • Metrics of force reduced (e.g., percussive) excavation efficiency have been established, allowing optimization of hardware.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Astronautica
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.08.035
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a standard analytical model and definition of efficiency metrics for lunar and planetary excavation

D. T. Britt, Robert P. Mueller, Jared Long-Fox, K. Zacny
3 citations
Acta Astronautica
Planetary Science and Exploration
0.99
article

Evaluation of a standard analytical model and definition of efficiency metrics for lunar and planetary excavation

D. T. Britt, Robert P. Mueller, Jared Long-Fox, K. Zacny
article en
3 citations

Abstract

To sustainably live on and explore the lunar and other planetary surfaces, in situ regolith will need to be used for resource extraction and infrastructure development. To evaluate and ensure such safety and efficiency of excavation operations in variable, site-specific regolith terranes with given equipment designs, reliable computational models are necessary. The work here evaluates the accuracy and reliability of a standard, well-established excavation force prediction model using published data from a previous planetary excavation experimental study and establishes efficiency metrics for force reduced excavation as a proof-of-concept. It is shown that the established excavation force prediction model is not able to simulate planetary excavation mechanics sufficiently and hence more advanced models of lunar and planetary excavation are needed to enable safer, faster, and more economical resource acquisition hardware development. The case study of the efficiency metrics being applied to the published data shows informative trends that can be used in future excavation hardware and tool path optimizations. These are recommended for use in future planetary excavation modeling and planning workflows. • Current models of excavation mechanics are not sufficient for lunar and planetary excavation analyses. • Extraterrestrial regolith excavation modeling requires reliability not given by current state-of-the-art models. • Metrics of force reduced (e.g., percussive) excavation efficiency have been established, allowing optimization of hardware.

Acta AstronauticaVol. 225
University of Central Florida (US), Honeybee Robotics (United States) (US), Kennedy Space Center (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute, Space Technology Mission Directorate
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Planetary Science and Exploration
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.