Fight Perturbations With Perturbations: Defending Adversarial Attacks via Neuron Influence

The vulnerabilities of deep learning models towards adversarial attacks have attracted increasing attention, especially when models are deployed in security-critical domains. Numerous defense methods, including reactive and proactive ones, have been proposed for model robustness improvement. Reactive defenses, such as conducting transformations to remove perturbations, usually fail to handle large perturbations. The proactive defenses that involve retraining, suffer from the attack dependency and high computation cost. In this article, we consider defense methods from the general effect of adversarial attacks that take on neurons inside the model. We introduce the concept of neuron influence, which can quantitatively measure neurons’ contribution to correct classification. Then, we observe that almost all attacks fool the model by suppressing neurons with larger influence and enhancing those with smaller influence. Based on this, we propose <i>Neuron-level Inverse Perturbation</i> (NIP), a novel defense against general adversarial attacks. It calculates neuron influence from benign examples and then modifies input examples by generating inverse perturbations that can in turn strengthen neurons with larger influence and weaken those with smaller influence. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets and models show that NIP outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of i) <i>effective</i> - it shows better defense success rate (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim \!\!\times 1.45$</tex-math></inline-formula>) against 13 adversarial attacks; ii) <i>elastic</i> - it maintains better defense (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim \!\!\times 3.4$</tex-math></inline-formula> in the worst case) on large perturbations; iii) <i>efficient</i> - it runs with only <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim \!\!1/6$</tex-math></inline-formula> time cost; iv) <i>extensible</i> - it can be applied to speaker recognition models and Baidu online image platforms. We further evaluate NIP against potential adaptive attacks and provide interpretable analysis for its effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2024.3445914
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fight Perturbations With Perturbations: Defending Adversarial Attacks via Neuron Influence

Haibo Jin, Haibin Zheng, Zhenguang Liu, Jinyin Chen et al.
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
0.69
article

Fight Perturbations With Perturbations: Defending Adversarial Attacks via Neuron Influence

Haibo Jin, Haibin Zheng, Zhenguang Liu, Jinyin Chen, Ruoxi Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The vulnerabilities of deep learning models towards adversarial attacks have attracted increasing attention, especially when models are deployed in security-critical domains. Numerous defense methods, including reactive and proactive ones, have been proposed for model robustness improvement. Reactive defenses, such as conducting transformations to remove perturbations, usually fail to handle large perturbations. The proactive defenses that involve retraining, suffer from the attack dependency and high computation cost. In this article, we consider defense methods from the general effect of adversarial attacks that take on neurons inside the model. We introduce the concept of neuron influence, which can quantitatively measure neurons’ contribution to correct classification. Then, we observe that almost all attacks fool the model by suppressing neurons with larger influence and enhancing those with smaller influence. Based on this, we propose <i>Neuron-level Inverse Perturbation</i> (NIP), a novel defense against general adversarial attacks. It calculates neuron influence from benign examples and then modifies input examples by generating inverse perturbations that can in turn strengthen neurons with larger influence and weaken those with smaller influence. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets and models show that NIP outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of i) <i>effective</i> - it shows better defense success rate (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim \!\!\times 1.45$</tex-math></inline-formula>) against 13 adversarial attacks; ii) <i>elastic</i> - it maintains better defense (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim \!\!\times 3.4$</tex-math></inline-formula> in the worst case) on large perturbations; iii) <i>efficient</i> - it runs with only <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sim \!\!1/6$</tex-math></inline-formula> time cost; iv) <i>extensible</i> - it can be applied to speaker recognition models and Baidu online image platforms. We further evaluate NIP against potential adaptive attacks and provide interpretable analysis for its effectiveness.

IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingVol. 22(2)
Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.