Opioid-Free Using Ketamine versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia during the Intraoperative Period in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Opioids effectively manage perioperative pain but have numerous adverse effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) eliminates intraoperative opioid use; however, evidence for its use in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is limited. This study assessed the effect of OFA using ketamine in VATS patients compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA). A total of 91 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy or segmentectomy were randomized to either the OFA group (ketamine) or the OSA group (remifentanil). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery (QoR) on postoperative day (POD) 1, measured with the QoR-40 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and adverse events. Both groups had comparable baseline and surgical characteristics. On POD 1, the QoR-40 score was higher in the OFA group than in the OSA group (164.3 ± 10.8 vs. 158.7 ± 10.6; mean difference: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 10.0; <i>p</i> = 0.015), though this did not meet the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 6.3. The visual analog scale score was lower in the OFA group as compared to the OSA group at 0-1 h (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 6.2 ± 2.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 1-4 h after surgery (3.4 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9; <i>p</i> = 0.003). The OFA group had a lower incidence of PONV (2 [4.4%] vs. 9 [19.6%]; <i>p</i> = 0.049) and postoperative shivering (4 [8.9%] vs. 13 [28.3%]; <i>p</i> = 0.030) than the OSA group at 0-1 h after surgery. Using OFA with ketamine proved feasible, as indicated by the stable intraoperative hemodynamics and absence of intraoperative awareness. Patients undergoing VATS with OFA using ketamine showed a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, QoR improvement compared to those receiving OSA with remifentanil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080881
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opioid-Free Using Ketamine versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia during the Intraoperative Period in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Wonjung Hwang, Kyung Soo Kim, Seok Whan Moon, Jae‐Won Huh et al.
6 citations
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
3.44
article

Opioid-Free Using Ketamine versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia during the Intraoperative Period in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Wonjung Hwang, Kyung Soo Kim, Seok Whan Moon, Jae‐Won Huh, Hoon Choi, Min-Ju Kim
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Opioids effectively manage perioperative pain but have numerous adverse effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) eliminates intraoperative opioid use; however, evidence for its use in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is limited. This study assessed the effect of OFA using ketamine in VATS patients compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA). A total of 91 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy or segmentectomy were randomized to either the OFA group (ketamine) or the OSA group (remifentanil). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery (QoR) on postoperative day (POD) 1, measured with the QoR-40 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and adverse events. Both groups had comparable baseline and surgical characteristics. On POD 1, the QoR-40 score was higher in the OFA group than in the OSA group (164.3 ± 10.8 vs. 158.7 ± 10.6; mean difference: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 10.0; <i>p</i> = 0.015), though this did not meet the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 6.3. The visual analog scale score was lower in the OFA group as compared to the OSA group at 0-1 h (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 6.2 ± 2.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 1-4 h after surgery (3.4 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9; <i>p</i> = 0.003). The OFA group had a lower incidence of PONV (2 [4.4%] vs. 9 [19.6%]; <i>p</i> = 0.049) and postoperative shivering (4 [8.9%] vs. 13 [28.3%]; <i>p</i> = 0.030) than the OSA group at 0-1 h after surgery. Using OFA with ketamine proved feasible, as indicated by the stable intraoperative hemodynamics and absence of intraoperative awareness. Patients undergoing VATS with OFA using ketamine showed a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, QoR improvement compared to those receiving OSA with remifentanil.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 14(8)
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.