Currency Management by International Fixed‐Income Mutual Funds

ABSTRACT Investments in international fixed‐income securities are exposed to significant currency risks. We collect novel data on currency derivatives used by U.S. international fixed‐income funds. We document that while 90% of funds use currency forwards, they hedge, on average, only 18% of their currency exposure. Funds' currency forward positions differ substantially based on risk management demands related to portfolio currency exposure, return‐enhancement motives such as currency momentum and carry trade, and strategic considerations related to past performance and fund clientele. Funds that hedge their currency risk exhibit lower return variability, but do not generate inferior abnormal returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Finance
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13381
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Currency Management by International Fixed‐Income Mutual Funds

Qifei Zhu, Clemens Sialm
18 citations
The Journal of Finance
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
7.01
article

Currency Management by International Fixed‐Income Mutual Funds

Qifei Zhu, Clemens Sialm
article en
18 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Investments in international fixed‐income securities are exposed to significant currency risks. We collect novel data on currency derivatives used by U.S. international fixed‐income funds. We document that while 90% of funds use currency forwards, they hedge, on average, only 18% of their currency exposure. Funds' currency forward positions differ substantially based on risk management demands related to portfolio currency exposure, return‐enhancement motives such as currency momentum and carry trade, and strategic considerations related to past performance and fund clientele. Funds that hedge their currency risk exhibit lower return variability, but do not generate inferior abnormal returns.

The Journal of FinanceVol. 79(6)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
7.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.