How collaborative, interpersonal, and disaster-responsive tendencies work together in non-face-to-face environments: lessons from prolonged pandemic experiences

This study investigates the dynamics of collaborative characteristics, interpersonal reactivity, and disaster situation responses in non-face-to-face settings, a response mechanism increasingly relevant in the wake of prolonged pandemics. By examining a group of 123 university students engaged in a seven-week non-face-to-face collaborative project, the research identifies relational patterns between collaborative traits such as regulation and efficacy, interpersonal empathy, and responses to disaster situations. The research methodology employs a sophisticated analytical framework comprising factor and canonical correlation analyses to identify how empathy and collaborative efficacy significantly related with disaster response in online collaborations. The mediation and moderation models analyzed confirm mutual mediation effects of collaborative regulation and interpersonal reactivity on situational empathy without significant moderation effects. This suggests there were direct causal relationships of collaborative regulation, collaborative efficacy, interpersonal reactivity on situational empathy. The findings underscore the pivotal role of empathy in collaboration during disasters offering a nuanced understanding of the social and psychological underpinnings that enable collective responses to crises in environments lacking physical interaction and illuminating the critical role of collaborative and interpersonal skills in such settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How collaborative, interpersonal, and disaster-responsive tendencies work together in non-face-to-face environments: lessons from prolonged pandemic experiences

Richard C. Feiock, Simon A. Andrew, Christopher Stream, Soyoung Kim
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Disaster Management and Resilience
1.13
article

How collaborative, interpersonal, and disaster-responsive tendencies work together in non-face-to-face environments: lessons from prolonged pandemic experiences

Richard C. Feiock, Simon A. Andrew, Christopher Stream, Soyoung Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamics of collaborative characteristics, interpersonal reactivity, and disaster situation responses in non-face-to-face settings, a response mechanism increasingly relevant in the wake of prolonged pandemics. By examining a group of 123 university students engaged in a seven-week non-face-to-face collaborative project, the research identifies relational patterns between collaborative traits such as regulation and efficacy, interpersonal empathy, and responses to disaster situations. The research methodology employs a sophisticated analytical framework comprising factor and canonical correlation analyses to identify how empathy and collaborative efficacy significantly related with disaster response in online collaborations. The mediation and moderation models analyzed confirm mutual mediation effects of collaborative regulation and interpersonal reactivity on situational empathy without significant moderation effects. This suggests there were direct causal relationships of collaborative regulation, collaborative efficacy, interpersonal reactivity on situational empathy. The findings underscore the pivotal role of empathy in collaboration during disasters offering a nuanced understanding of the social and psychological underpinnings that enable collective responses to crises in environments lacking physical interaction and illuminating the critical role of collaborative and interpersonal skills in such settings.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR), University of North Texas (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Seoul National University, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, National University of Science and Technology
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Disaster Management and Resilience
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.