Comparative study between the effectiveness of Amnion-CollaGee (Collagen-Gelatin-Elastin) as a biological product wound dressing and conventional dressing on the donor site of the split-thickness skin graft in animals model (rats)

Abstract Background The clinical application of amniotic membrane wound healing products is limited partially due to handling challenges. Amnion-CollaGee sponge dressing (ACS) provides better alternatives to traditional therapy in facilitating wound healing. The aims of the study are to optimize the effectiveness of ACS as a healing agent in donor-site split-thickness skin graft based on in vitro outcomes and to compare wound healing rates, pain sensitivity, and risks of infection between investigator ACS dressing with currently conventional Duoderm dressing (DD) via in vivo analysis. Materials and Methods Seven male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent split-thickness skin graft harvesting, with 1 × 1-cm grafts taken from both the right and left sides of the animals’ backs. The wounds on the right side (group 1) were dressed with ACS, while the wounds on the left side (group 2) were dressed with DD. The donor site wounds were assessed on the seventh, 14th, and 21st days of the experiment. Primary outcomes measured were rate of healing, pain sensitivity, and potential risks of infection. Secondary outcomes were lesion vascularity, pigmentation, and histopathological features. Results The size of the wounds treated with ACS was statistically smaller compared to that treated with DD. On day 21st, both types of dressings showed complete healing, thus contributing to better aesthetic value. Additionally, superior pain suppression was witnessed at ACS-treated graft sites compared to DD. Histopathological reports displayed better posttraumatic wound site inflammatory control, less tissue scarring, and abundant collagen growth in the ACS wing compared to the DD counterpart. Conclusions The biological ACS dressing appeared to facilitate rapid wound healing rates, reduce the risk of exposed wound infections, and enhance pain suppression in rodent models. ACS-based dressing agents are future interventional breakthroughs in graft donor site wound management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formosan Journal of Surgery
Published
2024-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000175
Primary Topic
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study between the effectiveness of Amnion-CollaGee (Collagen-Gelatin-Elastin) as a biological product wound dressing and conventional dressing on the donor site of the split-thickness skin graft in animals model (rats)

Yogeswaran Lokanathan, Nani Harlina Md Latar, Mh Busra Fauzi, Illayaraja Krishnan et al.
Formosan Journal of Surgery
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
article

Comparative study between the effectiveness of Amnion-CollaGee (Collagen-Gelatin-Elastin) as a biological product wound dressing and conventional dressing on the donor site of the split-thickness skin graft in animals model (rats)

Yogeswaran Lokanathan, Nani Harlina Md Latar, Mh Busra Fauzi, Illayaraja Krishnan, Farrah-Hani Imran, Geok Chin Tan, Ixora Kamisan, Haider Ayad Ashour Alasadi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The clinical application of amniotic membrane wound healing products is limited partially due to handling challenges. Amnion-CollaGee sponge dressing (ACS) provides better alternatives to traditional therapy in facilitating wound healing. The aims of the study are to optimize the effectiveness of ACS as a healing agent in donor-site split-thickness skin graft based on in vitro outcomes and to compare wound healing rates, pain sensitivity, and risks of infection between investigator ACS dressing with currently conventional Duoderm dressing (DD) via in vivo analysis. Materials and Methods Seven male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent split-thickness skin graft harvesting, with 1 × 1-cm grafts taken from both the right and left sides of the animals’ backs. The wounds on the right side (group 1) were dressed with ACS, while the wounds on the left side (group 2) were dressed with DD. The donor site wounds were assessed on the seventh, 14th, and 21st days of the experiment. Primary outcomes measured were rate of healing, pain sensitivity, and potential risks of infection. Secondary outcomes were lesion vascularity, pigmentation, and histopathological features. Results The size of the wounds treated with ACS was statistically smaller compared to that treated with DD. On day 21st, both types of dressings showed complete healing, thus contributing to better aesthetic value. Additionally, superior pain suppression was witnessed at ACS-treated graft sites compared to DD. Histopathological reports displayed better posttraumatic wound site inflammatory control, less tissue scarring, and abundant collagen growth in the ACS wing compared to the DD counterpart. Conclusions The biological ACS dressing appeared to facilitate rapid wound healing rates, reduce the risk of exposed wound infections, and enhance pain suppression in rodent models. ACS-based dressing agents are future interventional breakthroughs in graft donor site wound management.

Formosan Journal of SurgeryVol. 58(3)
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.