The Consumer−E-retailer−Intermediary Triad: Why and When Unfairness Perceptions Undermine Ethicality and Consumer Repurchase Intention

While there is considerable research on consumers and e-retailers; the relationships between the consumers, e-retailers, and their intermediaries—the ecommerce platforms are underexplored. The current research focuses on this triad and examines why and when price unfairness and product unfairness influence consumers’ perception of ethics of the e-retailer and their spillover effects on consumer repurchase intention from the ecommerce platforms. We adopted a mixed-method approach and conducted two studies. The qualitative study performed a content analysis based on 349 real comments of online shoppers. The quantitative study collected data from 632 existing customers of actual ecommerce platforms. The results show negative relationships between unfairness and consumer responses in the context of online retailing. Moreover, perception of e-retailer ethics explains the impacts of price unfairness and product unfairness on consumer repurchase intention from the ecommerce platforms. Besides, the salience of ethicality on repurchase intention depends on the level of prior shopping experience, such that this effect is lessened when shopping experience increases. This research offers significant implications for different stakeholders including e-retailers, ecommerce platforms, policymakers, and consumers to stimulate consumers’ perception of e-retailer ethics and repurchase intention from the ecommerce platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241274492
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Consumer−E-retailer−Intermediary Triad: Why and When Unfairness Perceptions Undermine Ethicality and Consumer Repurchase Intention

Trang Thi-Thuy Duong, Ngô Thị Hoa, Oanh Dinh Yen Nguyen, Quoc Anh Le
2 citations
Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)
Ethics in Business and Education
2.10
article

The Consumer−E-retailer−Intermediary Triad: Why and When Unfairness Perceptions Undermine Ethicality and Consumer Repurchase Intention

Trang Thi-Thuy Duong, Ngô Thị Hoa, Oanh Dinh Yen Nguyen, Quoc Anh Le
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While there is considerable research on consumers and e-retailers; the relationships between the consumers, e-retailers, and their intermediaries—the ecommerce platforms are underexplored. The current research focuses on this triad and examines why and when price unfairness and product unfairness influence consumers’ perception of ethics of the e-retailer and their spillover effects on consumer repurchase intention from the ecommerce platforms. We adopted a mixed-method approach and conducted two studies. The qualitative study performed a content analysis based on 349 real comments of online shoppers. The quantitative study collected data from 632 existing customers of actual ecommerce platforms. The results show negative relationships between unfairness and consumer responses in the context of online retailing. Moreover, perception of e-retailer ethics explains the impacts of price unfairness and product unfairness on consumer repurchase intention from the ecommerce platforms. Besides, the salience of ethicality on repurchase intention depends on the level of prior shopping experience, such that this effect is lessened when shopping experience increases. This research offers significant implications for different stakeholders including e-retailers, ecommerce platforms, policymakers, and consumers to stimulate consumers’ perception of e-retailer ethics and repurchase intention from the ecommerce platforms.

Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)Vol. 33(3)
Can Tho University (VN), University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Anova Corp (Vietnam) (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics in Business and Education
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.