Are Presidential Elections Relevant for Local Public Spending? Evidence from Mexico

Intergovernmental transfers in Mexico represent 84% of income of state and local governments and finance fundamental local public programs in that country. In this paper, we investigate the influence of federal elections and political institutions, such as party affiliation and the control of the national executive over Congress, on the federal budget allocated to state and local governments in Mexico. Our findings reveal that both, election years and the second year of a new national administration, significantly increase federal transfers to subnational governments. Furthermore, presidential elections have a notable impact on state and local budgets, particularly when the ruling parties align with the left or center-left of the political spectrum, resulting in increased resource allocation to subnational governments. Conversely, when a single party controls the national Congress, federal transfers to state and local governments decrease, possibly due to reduced political incentives to support legislators from various regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economics and Finance
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v16n9p14
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Presidential Elections Relevant for Local Public Spending? Evidence from Mexico

Alan Ponce, Raúl Alberto Ponce Rodríguez
International Journal of Economics and Finance
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Are Presidential Elections Relevant for Local Public Spending? Evidence from Mexico

Alan Ponce, Raúl Alberto Ponce Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Intergovernmental transfers in Mexico represent 84% of income of state and local governments and finance fundamental local public programs in that country. In this paper, we investigate the influence of federal elections and political institutions, such as party affiliation and the control of the national executive over Congress, on the federal budget allocated to state and local governments in Mexico. Our findings reveal that both, election years and the second year of a new national administration, significantly increase federal transfers to subnational governments. Furthermore, presidential elections have a notable impact on state and local budgets, particularly when the ruling parties align with the left or center-left of the political spectrum, resulting in increased resource allocation to subnational governments. Conversely, when a single party controls the national Congress, federal transfers to state and local governments decrease, possibly due to reduced political incentives to support legislators from various regions.

International Journal of Economics and FinanceVol. 16(9)
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are Presidential Elections Relevant for Local Public Spending? Evidence from Mexico — Alan Ponce, Raúl Alberto Ponce Rodríguez · International Journal of Economics and Finance (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS